Some are deeply concerned about the symbolism of the presence of Elie Wiesel in Concordia during last week’s peace week. Alex Woznica seems to be poorly informed about the controversies surrounding Elie Wiesel and the fact that his political views and actions are viewed, by many (including Israelis) as being radical and contrary to the promotion of peace in the Israel-Palestinian conflict.
Wiesel’s past disregard for Palestinian national rights to Jerusalem is the root cause of this primary contention. His visit comes at a time when Palestinian rights violations are more pressing than ever, with Israel’s government announcing plans to construct 238 new housing units in Israeli settlements in occupied East Jerusalem. This news only serves as a catalyst to the existential threat that Palestinians in East Jerusalem face following years of home demolitions and evictions.
Wiesel’s remarks this week at Concordia did no injury to human rights groups on campus. However, opposition was still prevalent and simply directed toward the man behind the visit himself.
Woznica’s defense of Wiesel’s alleged non-partisan view in the Concordian comes as a fallacy to many who sympathize with Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights. For all the nuances in Wiesel’s remarks, his position is clearly in alignment with the hardline ideology that has been the centrepiece for Israel’s institutional oppression of the Palestinian people.
It is precisely these hardline and discriminatory views that fuel the ideological premise for the illegal occupation of the Palestinian territories, and which SPHR takes ample care to denounce. Without this example of protest from Canadian grassroots human rights solidarity movements, we as citizens of a liberal democracy would fail to provide justice for any social movement that struggles for its self-determination and human rights preservation whether that be Palestinian, aboriginal or otherwise.
Max Kaiser