Categories
Music

Quickspins – Timber Timbre, Johnny Cash, Shakira,

Timber Timbre – Hot Dreams (Arts & Crafts; 2014)

Following their 2011 Polaris Prize nominated album, Creep on Creepin’ On, Timber Timbre have released Hot Dreams. Like the name suggests, Hot Dreams dances in the twilight, somewhere between dusk and dawn with an eerily cool and haunting sound signature to the Canadian folk trio.

Like their previous records, Hot Dreams is organic and cinematic. Taylor Kirk’s vocals border on disembodiment, featured against violinist Mika Posen’s string arrangements, and percussionist Simon Trottier’s lap steel drums. The title track is soft, moody and melancholic with traces of lamentation and yearning, elements recurrently felt throughout the group’s fifth album. Hot Dreams also plays with Western themes; “Grand Canyon” and “The Three Sisters” sound like the backdrop to a lone ranger riding through the Mojave desert. Hot Dreams is a blend of resounding rhythms and carefully composed melodies, proving that Timber Timbre are masters at musical storytelling.

 

Trial Track: “Grand Canyon”

Rating: 9/10

-Jessica Romera

Johnny Cash – Out Among The Stars (Columbia Legacy/Sony; 2014)

The ’80s were a rough time both creatively and personally for Johnny Cash. Not only was he in and out of rehab, his marriage to June Carter was falling apart and he hadn’t had a number one single since “One Piece at a Time” in 1976. His record label decided to enlist the aid of ‘countrypolitan’ producer Billy Sherrill to update his sound. The results caused the album to be shelved until it was unearthed 30 years later. Out Among The Stars is not a bad album per se: Cash’s vocals are at their peak, but the hokey production drains all of the grit and darkness out of his storytelling; qualities that fans have come to expect from “The Man in Black.”

Regardless of its faults, Out Among The Stars is still an interesting piece of lost recording history and attests that even the legendary Johnny Cash struggled to find his creative direction.

Trial Track: “She Used To Love Me A Lot”

Rating: 5.5/10

-Paul Traunero

 

Shakira- Shakira (RCA; 2014)

Here’s a riddle. What blends the most generic sounds imaginable with one of pop music’s most recognizable and original voices? Shakira’s new album, that’s what. Self-titled record: that’s been done. Random stars du-jour (like Blake Shelton) featured on a totally forgettable track: predictable. Featuring a reggae, country, dance, rock and electro song for broader appeal: seen before. Did we mention the cliché romantic lyrics about love and heartbreak? Yet somehow everything Shakira creates manages to stand apart in the heavy-radio-play, about-to-be-mixed-for-the-club bracket. The originality is mostly due to some all-Spanish songs like “I Can’t Remember To Forget You,” which is included in its full Spanish version as “Nunca Me Acuerdo De Olvidarte.” That nasal thing she does with her voice also reminds you of how sensually powerful she is as a musician. So what Shakira by Shakira can offer is paradox. It sounds like déjà-vu but it’s also fun, bold and unique. Riddled indeed.

Trial Track: “Can’t Remember To Forget You”

Rating: 4.5/10

-Romain Dompnier

Categories
Opinions

Making the grade for resumes

It’s about more than just your degree, use your time in university wisely

Obtaining a university degree is a huge accomplishment. Not only does it demonstrate that you have met the required learning to be certified as knowledgeable in a particular field but it also demonstrates tenacity, perseverance and dedication.

Unfortunately, a degree will only get you so far in the job market. Employers need employees that have degrees that correspond to their line of work but just because you have the paper doesn’t prove you can do the work.

A degree says things like: I am educated in the field of biology, psychology or English. I can say I know how to do lab work, I know about empathizing with people, I know how to analyze information and create arguments. But these are not the only skills necessary for employment.

Employers need people who can work in a group environment, who can problem solve, who show interest in a variety of different things. If you spend all your time in university doing school work you might have a great GPA, which is good for research jobs, but if you want a job outside of academia, your resume needs to show what you’ve done outside of the classroom.

Concordia provides an abundance of extracurricular activities that will allow you to develop skills and have experiences that will interest employers and make you a more desirable candidate.

Are you majoring in political science? Show how you apply what you learn in class to actual political situations by writing about politics for one of the student papers or participating in student politics like faculty associations or the CSU.

Are you pursuing a degree in marketing? Apply to be an advertising manager for any of the clubs, associations or groups at Concordia and demonstrate your skills by building ad revenue.

Are you working towards a degree in one of the sciences? Why not organize a science fair to demonstrate your work and the work of your peers?

You don’t even have to do things that are directly related to your degree. If you volunteer you demonstrate to an employer that you have compassion, that you have social and interpersonal skills and that you like to get involved. Depending on what kind of volunteering you do you can also demonstrate organizational skills, time management skills, financial skills, leadership abilities; the list is endless.

So while you’re planning out what classes you want to take next year make sure to also plan what you can do outside of class to improve your resume. It’s never too early or too late to start thinking about how you’re going to sell yourself on the job market.

Categories
Arts

We’re not buying this — film rejection letters

The Concordian retroactively attempts to set things right, refusing to produce disastrous movies

 

Dear Alec Berg, David Mandel and Jeff Schaffer,

Last year, you did the impossible — you ruined a Dr. Seuss story. Now, you’ve written Eurotrip, which is repulsive, idiotic and utterly uninteresting.

Eurotrip is a failure on all levels. It is not an excursion into Europe, as you claim. It is an excursion into the lowest forms of screenwriting. It could, and should, be used in film classes as a counter-example to, say, Casablanca, or Citizen Kane. Your cardboard vision of Europe is artistically bankrupt.

I didn’t believe in the characters. I doubt that you did either. Have you ever had friends? A relationship of any kind? Gone on a real trip, or at least dreamt of doing so? You should have written a film about these experiences. Eurotrip might as well be a science fiction film about aliens who have worked to master our looks, but couldn’t grasp the essence of humanity.

I was about to call the story ‘offensive,’ but you know what, I didn’t even care about it enough to be offended. You can’t just throw a few morally reprehensible concepts together and expect people to have their feelings hurt. Offending is a more subtle art than that. The fact that you used incest as comedy is sad and misguided. I wasn’t offended; I was appalled that none of you could tell the joke would fall flat.

The working title of Eurotrip was Ugly Americans. Stick with that.

Sincerely,

Elijah Bukreev

[divider]


Dear Mr. Levin,

Thank you for submitting your script for the movie Mutant Vampire Zombies from the ‘Hood! While we appreciate new and original idea submissions for horror movies, it is with a heavy heart that we must reject your request for production.

Due to the sensitivity of our audience, the inclusion of black and Asian ‘gang’ stereotypes (“G-Dog” and “Dragon” for example), as well as the idea of cannibal zombie vampires having a blood-fuelled orgy in an old strip club, are not aligned with the content we seek to push forward to the silver screen.

Despite our rejection, we strongly encourage you to seek independent film studios to help materialize your idea, no matter how silly it is.

Regards,

Jocelyn Beaudet

[divider]

On behalf of Disney Studios, we at The Concordian are writing to acknowledge the receipt of your pitch for a Lion King sequel. Unfortunately, we will not be pursuing this concept at this time.

As you are aware we have recently undergone a change in management and have shifted our focus as a result. We will no longer be funding franchise attempts through sequels.

Rather, we will be focusing on cultivating the Disney brand name by carefully crafting timeless stories.

The cornerstone of Disney has always been imagination and innovation; your script shows neither. The story is lifted from Romeo and Juliet while being less effective. Why is Simba xenophobic? When did Scar have children? Where were the outcast lionesses at the end of the first film? These elements were not present in the original because they were not necessary. This is not the story we want to tell. Producing this movie would be as ludicrous as retelling the original movie from the viewpoint of a set of secondary characters.

Thank you,

 

Robin Stanford

[divider]

Dear creators of this fourth opus of the celebrated Indiana Jones series—previously known as a trilogy.

Sincerely,That is why we decided, as a favour to humanity and to preserve the collective memory of Indy’s fans, to refuse you the right to produce The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. The iconic hat-and-whip-aficionados community would find this to be an unnecessary Indiana Jones movie. We also feel it necessary to tell you that a cheap alien twist is never the answer to your scripting problems.

Oh, and concerning the fridge versus bomb larger-than-life scene: seriously, what were you thinking?!Your manuscript has been returned because the idea has been done before. Your concept has actually been wonderfully done three times before and gifted us with one of the most entertaining trilogies of all time, not to mention one of the most lovable characters we have encountered in American filmography.

Frédéric T. Muckle

[divider]

 

Re: Mr. Marlon and Shawn Wayans,

Unfortunately, we will not consider producing Scary Movie at this time. While we can entertain the idea of spoofing conventional tropes of horror films, the script, as it stands, shows no humour. We believe that the slapstick brand of comedy is taking its last breaths as we enter into the new century.

Additionally, we find that your proposal to star in the films yourselves, and have your brother, Keenan Ivory, direct it, feels like too much of a family affair. It seems to be a script written solely to create jobs for yourselves.

We also find some of your proposed casting choices questionable, especially that of Carmen Electra — who has proven in the past that she cannot act, and is indeed not funny.

Finally, we feel that Scary Movie will not have mass appeal and would not be financially profitable — we can hardly foresee a sequel, let alone a franchise, develop based on this movie.

All the best with your future endeavours,

Alex Lau

[divider]

Mr. Nguyen,

While we appreciate your script submission for Birdemic: Shock and Terror, it is with absolute certainty that we express not only our unanimous rejection, but also our complete bafflement into your submission in the first place.

Birdemic is quite possibly one of the least competently hacked-together scripts to have ever graced our presence. To this moment, we are still unsure of how or why the birds in your movie can simultaneously spray acid and explode on impact because of global warming. With that being said, we strongly suggest you give up your career as a film writer immediately and perhaps take up knitting or stamp collecting.

Regards

Jocelyn Beaudet

Categories
Music

Quickspins – Taking Back Sunday, Foster The People, Nick Waterhouse, High Klassified

Taking Back Sunday – Happiness Is (Hopeless Records; 2014)

Taking Back Sunday’s newest release, Happiness Is, is a reunion of sorts. The album marks the first time all five members who played on the group’s first record, Tell All Your Friends, have released an album together in over 12 years. Despite this throwback, the new songs have evolved musically. The album is distinctly less emo and, as a whole, manages to be an alternative rock album in the vein of 30 Seconds to Mars’ more recent releases. The vocal style of Adam Lazzara is much more mature than in previous albums and manages to sound less whiny. Overall, the album is an improvement, but no element of it stands out as particularly excellent. The lyrics are at times cliché and certain tracks, such as “We Were Younger Then,” have rather nonsensical lyrics that at first listen might appear to hold a deeper meaning, but ultimately do not. The musical landscape is at times repetitive but at least the album cover is styled in a visually attractive retro way.

Trial Track: “Stood a Chance”

Rating: 6.5/10

-Justinas Staskevicius

 

Nick Waterhouse – Holly (Innovative Leisure; 2014)

Following the critical success of his 2012 debut Time’s All Gone, Los Angeles singer-songwriter Nick Waterhouse returns with a polished sophomore album that feels both contemporary yet classic. This loosely conceptual album about a fictional deceased twentysomething Los Angeles scenester, draws inspiration from the films Mulholland Drive and Chinatown and the atmosphere of Raymond Chandler novels. Holly is like a film noir: narrative, brisk, mysterious and fully satisfying.

In spite of its concept, Holly never feels pretentious or inaccessible. With its perfect fusion of garage rock, retro-soul R&B and even some surf-rock moments, the album has a strong pop-sensibility and is incredibly catchy and smooth.

In addition to some carefully injected covers by Ty Segall and Mose Allison, Holly offers a deeper narrative experience for listeners who dare venture into Waterhouse’s world.

Trial Track: “This Is a Game”

Rating: 8.5/10

– Paul Traunero

 

Foster The People – Supermodel (Columbia;2014)

 Foster the People’s new album Supermodel is not like their debut Torches. ‘Kicks’ will not be ‘pumped up’ as instantly as on their first record. The synthesizer beats are not as immediately infectious, the boyish squeal lead vocalist Mark Foster made us love isn’t as prominent. But don’t write off this supermodel as thin or shallow just yet. All 12 songs somehow sound bigger and deeper. High pitched anthems, of which there still are, give way to more grown up verses and acoustic riffs that showcase a range we had not yet seen from the L.A. based band. The lyrics are also more easily understandable and relatable, if you care about that sort of thing. It’s like Foster the People grew up; instead of X-Acto knife-ing  straight to our hearts they decided to pound through our chest with a more blunt instrument. It takes more time to get there, but once you’re a couple listens deep, you can’t turn your back on this supermodel.

Trial Track:”The Angelic Welcome Of Mr. Jones”

Rating:7.5

-Romain Dompnier

High Klassified- Palindroma (Fool’s Gold Records; 2014)

High Klassified is an up-and-coming electronic artist from our very own home town. He has been working alongside some rather important producers this year, like Lunice, Kaytranada, and Tommy Kruize. Currently signed to Fool’s Gold Records, a local independent label owned by Montreal musician/producer A-trak, High Klassified released his debut EP on March 4. Palindroma is comprised of four original songs, and has a rather dark feeling to them. They paint abstract undertones with a lot of ambient background noises; it’s definitely an earthy and organic setlist. There are even some anime vocals in the background to give that “Naruto soundscape” final touch. All in all, High Klassified has truly outdone himself as the newest member of the Fool’s Gold family and we should absolutely expect more from this Montreal musician.

 

Trial Track: “Outro”

Rating: 8/10

-Jonathan Cohen

 

Categories
Opinions

Confessions of a 20-something #18: Bus ride etiquette

On bus ride etiquette and the people who don’t, in any way, deserve to have your seat

The STM has made no secret of its belief that there are some commuters who deserve a seat on public transit more than you: pregnant women, senior citizens, people with strollers, etc. For the most part, these (somewhat) unspoken rules or code of conduct are respected.

Now, let me preface this by saying that I am normally very aware of those people too frail or too strained to stand for the length of a bus ride. I am usually very considerate and “generous” with my seat-giving. However, I ride the 165 through Cote-des-Neiges, a cultural epicentre punctuated by numerous mental health facilities, from terminus to terminus. My tired legs need a rest too, and there is nothing more satisfying than keeping one seat for the length of the ride.

If the STM has put a “to-do” list in place—a reference point for commuter etiquette—then my personal, ridiculous experiences in the 165 have encouraged me to do the opposite. I have compiled my own list of “not to-do’s”: a guide to the people that you are NOT obligated to give up your seat for.

Think of it as Emily Post for impatient Montrealers.

-I will not give up my seat for you if you are waving your flaccid penis in my face. Is that thing supposed to be intimidating?

-I will not give up my seat for you if you are decked head to toe in tacky designer knock-offs. I’m sorry, is a “Trendi” bag or “Canadian Moose” jacket supposed to speak to your social status? I’m impressed, really. Sit your bejewelled ass down right here in my seat, it’s an honour.

-I will not give up my seat for you if you have not bathed since September 2006.

-I will not give up my seat for you if you cannot stand up for two stops (which incidentally, you refuse to walk). If you’re breathing like Darth Vader, completely winded after stepping up into the bus, then your first concern should not be sitting down.

-I will not give up my seat for you if you pay your entire bus passage in dimes. Points for frugality, but youare by far one of the most annoying (and time consuming) creatures I’ve encountered.

-I will not give up my seat for you if you are dragging one of those stupid grocery carriers around, OR are pushing a stroller filled with nothing but shopping bags. An extra 5,000 points is deducted from the person who asks to get on the bus before everyone else because “strollers are priority.” Another 1,500 points is deducted if there are dogs in said stroller.

-I will not give up my seat for you if you are muttering prayers to Satan, threaten bloody murder, and/or have applied makeup and glitter gel heavy handedly. I will, however, point to the nearest pharmacy and recommend a renewal for your medication. And maybe a facecloth.

-I will not give up my seat for you merely because you want MY seat. I know, it’s great. That’s why it’s MY seat. But it’s alright, you can console yourself by leaning your crotch on my arm, staring furiously, and reading my text messages…they’re all about you anyways. Crazy b.

Despite all of these creatures, I will stubbornly continue to enjoy daily bus rides from my usual seat, outrightly (and comfortably) judging others for not giving up theirs.

Categories
Opinions

No classes on April 7 means no excuse not to vote

Students might be missing a day of class but they’re gaining a great opportunity

On April 7, all classes and institutional activities will be canceled as required by the Quebec Election Act. This gives students the chance to familiarize themselves about the candidates and election issues, if they haven’t already, as well as give them no excuse for not voting.

If for some reason students aren’t able to make it back to their riding on April 7 to vote, they can take advantage of the advance polling stations that will be set up in the atrium of the Library building, March 28, April 1 and 2, from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m..

In sum, all students who are eligible to vote will have the time and opportunity to do so whether they live in Westmount or Longueuil.

Furthermore, who can be upset with a day off from school? Voting isn’t an all day affair so in fact it’s almost like a three day weekend.

However, it’s important that everyone who can vote, does vote. It is also important that these votes be informed.

Election campaigns are hectic and there is always a flurry of activity and media coverage and it can be difficult to keep up. Still, when it comes to deciding who is going to be your voice in provincial decisions you should know as much as possible about the person and party that your vote is supporting. Therefore take the opportunity of a class-free Monday to read about the candidates in your riding and inform yourself about the parties running.

Full-time workers are granted only three hours to vote, whereas students have an entire day; this is a privilege that should be taken advantage of.

Given the number of people who complain that not enough students come out to vote and because students often complain that the people in power don’t address student needs, students should be especially motivated to make a strong appearance at the polls.

According to an article published by the Montreal Gazette, “Liberals hope to court youth vote,” Feb 23, 2014, barely 40 per cent of voters aged 18-24 voted in the last federal election. This may explain why the federal budget took so little consideration of student needs. If the government doesn’t think young people are interested or will get involved they won’t bother to cater to them.

Now is the chance to prove all the people who believe that young voters are indifferent and can’t be bothered to vote that they are wrong.

There’s no excuse to miss the polls, go out and vote.

More information on Concordia’s polling booths: http://www.concordia.ca/cunews/main/stories/2014/03/13/quebec-election-studentscanvoteondowntowncampus.html

Letters to the editor

Recommendation to take Concordia University Security Department training

 

I would highly recommend that all students invest in themselves and attend the training workshop organized by the Concordia University Security Department.

I sincerely hope that no students will ever have to use the skills learned in the trainings, but having these tools at your disposal can come in handy

Rape Aggression Defense (RAD) training, is only for women. The instructors are Lyne Denis and Valerie Bolduc, and they are phenomenal women with a wealth of knowledge and experience. The instructors are also very considerate of any existing personal physical injuries that the participants have, and you will be well taken care of. Although the training is called Rape Aggression Defense, the tools learned in the training can be used in other situations that women will face. The training lasts between 9-12 hours, and only costs $20. It is very important to note that it is a very reasonable cost considering the duration of the training, and that once you finish the RAD training, there is a lifetime practice policy. This policy allows any person to attend any RAD training workshop around North America free of charge! It is a very good investment in not only yourself, but your future, and I highly recommend it.

The training is an amazing opportunity to meet other people from around the university. I would highly recommend that everyone learn more about the trainings, and register for whichever training suits your needs.

The link to have more information on the training session can be found online at: http://security.concordia.ca/prevention/training/rad/

-Melissa Lemieux

 

I’ve had the pleasure of knowing Chuck Wilson for three years now, and he has my complete endorsement for the job of CSU President.

Chuck actually cares about each and every student on this campus and has often gone out of his way to help whole faculties, often with little to no credit. I first met Chuck when he was the chair of the Fine Arts Student Alliance (FASA) in 2011 and in often-tenuous meetings during the Maple Spring, Chuck kept a level head and helped us ensure that our conversations were productive, even in such a high-stress environment.

When a delay in counting absences by last year’s CSU chair meant that it was too late for Fine Arts candidates to run in the 2012-2013 CSU by-election, Chuck was the person who informed me about it and looked over my petition. With his help, I was able to assemble a team of students that worked as ex-officio officers on Council. This year, there are three Fine Arts candidates running and I think that in large part, that has to do with Chuck. It may have taken a gap year to get the ball rolling, but we did it. Chuck made me care, I made others care, and here were are today.

He is the only candidate, in my opinion, who has laid out a plan with realistic outcomes that focuses on academics—and isn’t that why we’re here, ultimately—and empowers the many student groups on campus so that they can take on social activist roles, instead of making that the job of the CSU. We have such great resources on campus, and Chuck wants to help you find them! Remember, just because your friend is running for another slate doesn’t mean that their presidential candidate is the best fit. No matter who gets voted into office, Chuck will work with them and be the leader that the CSU needs at this pivotal moment in its history.

Chuck does things (dot com), and that’s why you should vote for him for CSU President.

Erika Couto

BFA Art History & Film Studies ’13

Current MA Art History student

VP Clubs & Services FASA (2012-2013)

Ex-Officio officer CSU (2012-2013)

 

Letter of Endorsement

Chuck Wilson is the epitome of “qualified” when it comes to the position of Presidency of the Concordia Student Union. I have had the privilege of working with Chuck for over a year now within the Engineering Faculty, and I can attest that there is no better person suited to be the driving force of such an encompassing student association. Chuck has this incredibly rare ability to see any and all projects to total completion, thereby actually accomplishing the things that he sets out to do. In terms of his endeavors, Chuck is hyper aware of all of the ongoings at Concordia, across all departments, and therefore pursues the things that matter most to students.

As an involved student, I have consulted Chuck on probably every important matter related to my co-curricular involvement that I have ever encountered. Whether it has to do with trying to incorporate an association, or the specifics about booking an event, he just has this super solid understanding of how systems function at Concordia. Chuck has spent his academic career striving for improvement within Concordia, seeking solutions and alternatives to everything from an individual’s mundane questions to our university’s vision of its future.

He is already a driving, inspirational force within the Engineering Faculty, and I would love nothing more than to see what he will accomplish as President of the CSU.

See what he plans to do for you at chuckdoesthings.com. Vote for Chuck Wilson, because he actually does things.

Andrea Cartile

B.Sc. Biology Specialization 2009-2012

Current B. Eng. (Mech) Expected 2016

VP External CSCE 2012-2013

VP Marketing SAE 2013-2014

Vote Melissa Payette for CSU President

My name is Bianca Bertoia and I am the President of the John Molson Undergraduate Case Competition (JMUCC). JMUCC is not only the largest international undergraduate case competition in the world, but also one of the most prestigious. As JMUCC hosts students from 24 of the best universities around the world, I’ve been lucky enough to meet some of the world’s most talented students and our future business leaders. There is no question in my mind that Melissa Payette, Experience CSU’s Presidential Candidate, is one such student.

I’ve had the pleasure of working with Melissa in two separate environments. I first met her when working at Chapters Pointe-Claire. Melissa had already been working there for a year when I started, and she was the most welcoming person on staff. Her passion for books and knowledge and her helpful disposition stood out immediately.

In Melissa’s role as the President of CASA Cares—CASA’s non-profit wing—I’ve seen the extent of her compassion and her greatness as a leader. She manages a team of almost 20 executives and does it flawlessly. The respect that Melissa’s team has for her is clear, and the events they execute are successful in both raising money for charity and uniting students from all faculties.

This year, I’ve had the pleasure of working with Melissa on CASA’s Board of Directors (BOD) as well as on CASA’s Special Projects Committee. In both circumstances, Melissa has been an amazing person to work with. She is unafraid to voice her opinions, but always in a way that is respectful of others. Oftentimes at BOD, she will step in and mediate between two opposing parties to help them better understand one another. Mel is a problem solver who is always full of great ideas and suggestions.

On CASA’s Board of Directors, I’ve also been able to work with Scott Carr and Maylen Cytryn, Experience CSU’s VP Finance and VP Clubs & Internal candidates respectively. I’m amazed by Scott’s passion for policy, constitutional knowledge and number-crunching abilities on a daily basis. As a newcomer to the board, Maylen has been an excellent chairperson who’s demonstrated how quickly she can master unfamiliar surroundings. I am confident that Melissa has pulled together a unified team of dedicated students to form the Experience CSU team.

There is no doubt in my mind that Melissa Payette is the right candidate to lead the CSU forward. She is both a powerful and compassionate leader and the perfect person to bridge the gap between faculties. Melissa will stand up for students’ rights and deliver what they believe in. Concordia students would be lucky to have her lead their union forward.

Bianca Bertoia

President

John Molson Undergraduate Case Competition (JMUCC)

 

Vote for Melissa Payette for CSU President

My name is Jessica Viscosi and I am the Vice-President of Finance and Vice-President of Events for CASA Cares. CASA Cares is the non-profit segment of the John Molson School of Business. The goal of CASA Cares is to promote social awareness and responsibility at the school and encourage all students to get involved within the community.

I have been lucky enough to be part of many student-run associations throughout my education and worked alongside great student leaders. One of those outstanding student leaders that I have had the privilege to work with is Melissa Payette. For that reason, it is my pleasure to endorse Melissa Payette as president of the Experience CSU team.

Working closely with Melissa for the past two years on CASA Cares has been a truly rewarding experience. Her dedication to the entire team has been admirable. Throughout her presidency at CASA Cares she has managed to lead the CASA Cares team to having the most successful year to date.

Melissa is hard working, passionate about her work and goes above and beyond all expectations. However, her strongest asset is how approachable she is. This I believe is a very important quality in a leader who will be representing the entire student body. Having a leader who is approachable will allow students to feel comfortable voicing their thoughts and opinions. This in turn will allow students to feel as if the university truly is working with their best interests in mind.

With Melissa’s experience, there is no doubt that she will be able to lead the Experience CSU team to success. I strongly believe that Melissa has surrounded herself with a cross-faculty team that will work tirelessly for the best interest of the students at Concordia University.

Jessica Viscosi

 

It’s not often in student politics that one comes across a person as dedicated to the union, and with such a good sense of ethics and values, as Chuck Wilson.

Chuck has worked for years now developing and strengthening fair and just policies across several student groups. He understands rules and regulations, and he understands not bending them for himself or his friends’ personal benefit. Chuck is the guy who doesn’t forget the rules when they’re complicated or inconvenient to apply, and he isn’t afraid to make the hard decisions.

Chuck is the kind of guy who will work with anyone and everyone, and I know this because he has already worked with anyone and everyone, from all sides of the political spectrum. He just wants to get the job done. It takes a special kind of person to buck the system and stay dedicated to the concept of abolishing executive slates and run independently for the office of president. That kind of person is a leader, and there is no better one available in this union right now than Chuck Wilson.

I was lucky enough to work with Chuck on Senate in the 2012-2013 year. It is hard to find anyone more dedicated than Chuck. Because Chuck does things, you should vote for him for President of the CSU!

He has done so much for the CSU on Council this year, and I have complete faith he is the best fit for president. Please vote for him during the elections to get our union some strong, competent, qualified, and most importantly, independent leadership.

-Melissa Lemieux

Vote for Chuck, Chuck does things!

I have repeated this numerous times randomly throughout this week to anyone I met.

I have been a big supporter of Chuck since the beginning and my support has grown even more after watching the debates.

First, he has demonstrated that he has the most experience and a deep understanding of legal affairs, and Concordia policies out of all the presidential candidates. CSU needs someone at the head who knows how the system works to be able to use it to their advantage. Out of all the candidates, he was the most eloquent and demonstrated that he has given a great deal of thought to the subjects that were brought up and even if he didn’t, his extensive knowledge of how CSU works and the different entities within helped him give clear responses showing that he knows what he’s doing.

Chuck takes action; we need a man of action, especially when they have a beard.

Second, he wants to revamp the horrible grey tunnel!!!

Third, he has a beard, enough said.

Check out his website chuckdoesthings.com to get an insight on his platform and find out how awesome Chuck is!

-Daniella Tran Van

 

To the readers of The Concordian,

I won’t go on with drivel about why any of the given teams is the best, nor will I explain why I’ve had “the pleasure” of working with someone. These are all formalities that will dismiss a message.

I will speak to what I believe it takes to have an excellent team, and that is a great balance of thinkers, doers, opinionated people and compromisers. Personally, I have worked to some measure with Scott, Maylen and Melissa—all of which are running for the Experience CSU team. Maylen is the person I worked with directly for the past year on the John Molson Marketing Association (JMMA). Maylen is meticulously detail oriented and very competent with dealing with stressful and uncomfortable conflicts in a workplace. I say this because our goal with JMMA was to change everything the previous year and she was a perfect partner in dealing with all the tribulations that come with delivering real, meaningful change. I want you to think about how hard it is to deal with failures and how to convert them into successes, and how the ideal person would deal with it. Now I invite you to talk to Maylen about those things.

For the other two, I have never worked directly with any of them but I’ve sat in boardrooms with them and been to many social gatherings where they were present. Melissa led CASA Cares this year, which is the charitable wing of the Commerce and Administration Students’ Association. Again, I won’t pretend to know how it was to work with her, but I’ll just tell you that she convinced her team of 14 that meeting on Friday nights is a great idea. Combine this demonstration of charisma along with the fact that she donated her time to the only philanthropic branch of the John Molson Business School and I think you would reconsider whatever prejudice you may have about what business students in general stand for.

Scott was previously involved with Enactus Concordia, again a branch that deals with entrepreneurship and social change. He’s been a massive advocator of transparent workings in the CASAJMSB Board of Directors and has never missed a beat when it comes to proper conduct.

I want you to consider what it means to allow proper business representation on the CSU and that it’s not some fantasy about suits and ties that want to grab your money. Yes, there are student who think this way, but these three individuals are not conventional business students, because conventional business students would not have the chops to run for the CSU to begin with.

Charles Gedeon

Outgoing President of JMMA and ex-sociology student

 

Vote Chuck for CSU President

If you vote for one person in this CSU election, let it be Chuck Wilson for president. When I sat on CSU council last year, Chuck was in his second year of his work on Senate. He came to almost every council meeting, so I got to know him in a working dynamic quite quickly. Chuck was a constant resource; he always had detailed information, a near-encyclopedic knowledge of our union’s rules, workings and by-laws and those of other organizations, sophisticated insight into controversial issues, and he often assumed positions of authority very naturally. It was very common at these meetings that someone would end up appealing to Chuck for an answer to a question or for resources. In fact, those in Concordia’s student political community recognize his website, www.chuckdoesthings.com, as the unofficial guide to our student union—before it was used for his campaigning, it hosted valuable resources, documents, and information essentials for us to do our jobs. Even our chairperson would occasionally reference the meeting agenda or amended by-laws and standing regulations that he maintained meticulously in and outside of meetings. If you were to approach them and ask, people across Concordia’s community—staff, administration, political leaders, members of Space Concordia, and so on—would you identify Chuck as a highly competent, brilliant, capable leader? Many, many people at Concordia would say they are excited to see what this person can do for our union. Please, please vote for him so we can find out.

Hannah Hackney

 

Experience CSU will make a difference for Concordia

My name is Chris Carpini and I am the President of the John Molson Competition Committee (JMCC). The past three years of my undergraduate career have been dedicated to working on JMSB’s competition program. During my time here, the program has become the world’s largest undergraduate competition program as we close a record-breaking year with nearly 40 podium finishes and countless gold medals.

I’ve travelled around the world to attend over a dozen competitions and over 10 inter-university conferences, meeting tons of students in the process. I know strong student leaders when I see them. As such, it is with pleasure that I endorse Melissa Payette and her entire Experience CSU team for the executive of the Concordia Student Union.

I’ve worked closely with Melissa on CASA’s Board of Directors. As the President of CASA Cares, Melissa is a compassionate leader—what stands out most when talking to her is that she truly cares for what others have to say. My colleagues and I have spent many nights venting to her about problems and roadblocks within our committees. The outcome is always consistent: next day, well-educated and researched opinions that truly help to move our organizations forward.

Moreover, I know how easily student organizations can be seen as unapproachable amongst the greater student body. Melissa is the type of person who breaks down these barriers. I strongly believe that Melissa will care for the unique needs of Concordia students and will go out of her way to make sure everyone’s voice is heard—she is a go-to person and knows how to get things done.

Backing her is a stacked team on Experience CSU—individuals who will absolutely work well together. Both Scott Carr and Maylen Cytryn have been involved in JMSB’s competition program. Scott is a gold-medal winning competitor who is always open to a new challenge and whose unique solutions leave judging panels speechless. Maylen is an up-and-coming star in the program whose infectiously bubbly personality is combined with a hard-working attitude. The competition program has trained these individuals to recognize real problems within organizations and come up with the most creative and feasible ways to solve them.

I am confident that these three individuals have surrounded themselves with a team that will make for an incredibly hard-working CSU. Undoubtedly, this is what Concordia students need—strong, dedicated, compassionate leaders who will work sleepless nights for us.

        Chris Carpini, JMCC President

 

Support Community Matters and Ben Prunty for CSU President

I give my full support to Ben Prunty as president of the CSU and his dynamic team Community Matters.

Last semester, I had the pleasure of working with Ben during my internship with the Concordia Food Coalition—a community service-learning component in Professor Satoshi Ikeda’s course, The Political Economy of Food. Ben led our team of five interns in developing his brainchild—a conference on sustainable food systems. To our team’s delight, the Concordia Transitions Conference was a huge success—approximately 150 community members attended the event throughout the day.

Thanks to Ben’s exceptional leadership skills, our team never felt like the conference was solely his “baby.” On the contrary, Ben has an ability to inspire other people and mobilize them to accomplish a common goal. He also has a talent for identifying the skills that his team members can bring to the table and incorporating those strengths in the larger picture.

More than anything, Ben knows how to create a sense of community among his fellow team members. Not only did the Concordia Transitions Conference create dialogue surrounding food initiatives on campus, but it also created this same sense of community among its guests—a feeling that together we could accomplish great things for our university.

As project coordinator of one of the many wonderful fee levy groups on campus and a proud supporter of the “No” Campaign against the per-faculty fee levy referendum question, there is no doubt in my mind that Concordia’s vibrant community is one of the university’s greatest assets. If you want a Concordia with a sustainable student-run food system, support for student-led projects and most of all, a community that “matters”, vote for Ben Prunty and the rest of his team next week!

Megan Michaud

 

SAY YES to supporting education, awareness, solidarity and empowerment!

Dear editor,

I want to encourage all Concordia students (especially those opposing fee levy groups) to check out some really amazing resources they have on campus such as the Center for Gender Advocacy (CGA).

Here are just some of their more recent accomplishments:

– Successfully lobbied the Concordia administration for a sexual assault centre, which opened its doors in November 2013

– Was apart of the coalition of groups that forced Quebec’s decision to modify the civil code to give trans people the right to change their gender legally without having to undergo surgery and forced sterilization

– Walked with over 1,000 people at the March for Missing and Murdered women

—organized by Missing Justice (one of their campaigns)—on Feb. 14 to raise awareness about gendered and racialized violence in Quebec and Canada

– Increased sexual assault awareness and consent workshops and trainings, which are given on and off campus and free of charge

– Expanded a programming with a new speaker series called, Thick Skin: Reflections on race, gender and political resistance

– Has a second space (located at 2110 De Maisonneuve W.) which is increasingly utilized by students and activists (including new autonomous action groups) to hold meetings and events

 

I want to emphasize that the CGA is an inclusive space with open-minded, generous and super hard working staff—they really do a lot with a little, especially given the centre’s very broad mandate. They offer various activities (speakers, workshops, film screenings) on a very wide-range of issues related to gender—I mean, gender touches all aspects of our lives, whether we realize it or not, but I think it is fantastic that they cover so much!

I encourage you to help keep this awesome place going by voting ‘Yes’ to fee levy groups (increasing their 29 cent per credit to 37 cents). Even if you think that you may not use their services, you just might need (or want) to someday, and also just know that you are also helping to create a safer, fairer and hopefully a more open-minded campus and city by supporting organizations such as the CGA. So, all this to say is that paying your extra eight cents is well-worth it for you and for others!

Annette Kassaye MacDonald, B.A Political Science/Human Rights Studies 2013

Former Board Member at the Centre For Gender Advocacy (2011)

Community matters.

But what does that mean? An executive team that acknowledges academics can not be disconnected from university and government policies, these being inextricably related to having sufficient desks in a classroom, not having to work more than study, and eating healthy affordable food, all of which is in turn connected to your academic experience. This team understands that, and has the capacity to work for students’ interests at all levels. Speaking of levels, the VP-Academic/Advocacy candidate recently initiated the first Concordia Student Congress directly connecting the CSU to your student departmental associations so that you can have a voice at many levels of student democracy. As former VP-External of the Concordia Graduate Students’ Association (GSA), I have worked with almost every person on this team and I know they will guide the CSU to make this campus a community of communities in which democracy is not just a gift to those elected, but something all students can participate in through clear democratic mechanisms (including a VP-Finance who vows to make budget stuff fun—you can’t pass up the possibility of seeing this happen). It means a team of students whose experience stands out: a bilingual VP-External/Mobilization candidate whose health campaign got students jogging at 8 a.m. and represented his department many times at the provincial level; a VP-Academic/Advocacy candidate who knows how to defend students from his work with CSU Advocacy Centre; a VP-Loyola candidate who has volunteered on both campuses for years; a VP-Sustainability candidate who attended provincial student meetings in her free time; a Presidential candidate who already made substantial gains for our food systems as CSU VP-Sustainability, and who have proven with their past actions their commitment to students’ academic fulfillment, future, and rights. Don’t give up the opportunity to have them live up to their potential, and most importantly that of our students’ and community’s. Vote Community Matters.

Nadia Hausfather

Humanities PhD program

 

FOR ONLINE PUBLICATION ONLY

 

My name is Alexandre Tomovic, and I am the current President of Colors of Concordia and Vice-President of Casa Cares, the charity wing of JMSB.  Being a part of Colors of Concordia has taught me the value of cultural diversity within the Concordia community and the importance of having well-rounded associations.  Team Experience CSU encompasses a variety of executives who deliver specific strengths from different areas; this would be the first major point where Experience CSU has irrevocably gained my trust and support.

Over two years with CASA Cares, I have had the pleasure of working with Melissa Payette, particularly under her presidency this year. I cannot stress enough the degree of fairness and professionalism that Melissa brings towards any matter. The amount that she has grown is beyond astonishing; Melissa has not only presided over many successful fundraising events, but has also gained trust and respect from her team and other students alike.  Managing a team of 17 executives requires patience and the ability to keep tasks on track.  In the fall semester alone, under Melissa’s guidance, CASA Cares raised over $14,000 for great causes including  the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation, Movember, and Concordia’s Volunteer Abroad Program.  This semester, Melissa has helped coordinate our biggest event – the CASA Cares Fashion Show benefitting the Montreal Children’s Hospital, which in its 11th year, will bring the total proceeds raised to over $100,000.  Suffice to say, there is no one better suited for the position of CSU President; the entire school will benefit from a fair leader who will strive to place the needs of students before her own.

Forming the 2013-2014 CASA Cares team was not an easy task, as we had over 50 applicants.  One applicant that immediately stood out was Sabrina Jorrin; she has since fulfilled her mandate above all expectations as VP External.  Always sporting a smile, Sabrina’s good mood is contagious and her motivation to exceed is second to none.  She quickly gained our trust and is extremely devoted in accomplishing her tasks within any role she takes on.  I truly believe that the entire student community of Concordia would be in the best possible hands with Sabrina.

I could elaborate furthermore on them, as well as Maylen, Scott, and Toshimi, however the fact is that the CSU will grow the most under Experience CSU, and they will all accomplish great things for Concordia University.

 

VOTE NO to the Per Faculty Fee Levy Referendum Question:

 

There have been many editorials in recent weeks concerning fee-levy groups and who should be paying for these groups and services. The fee levy groups here at Concordia enrich the community providing services such as; a daily free vegan lunch, a beautiful greenhouse where students can enjoy a hot cup of tea to relax, they provide an outlet for student news, advocacy for gender and queer issues, and the list goes on. All of these fee levy groups, 17 in total, provide free services to all undergrad students regardless of their faculty. Together we create a diverse community and we want to see this community continue together, with the support of all faculties, instead of student segregation as a result of faculty opt-outs. Each one of these groups has been voted into existence with a majority vote of the undergraduate population. While we may not benefit directly from every one of these services, if we can make a difference to even one students experience then I believe it is worthwhile. It is for this reason that I invite you all to come out and VOTE NO to the per faculty fee levy referendum question this week during the CSU elections and to let your voice be heard. Together we can keep the fee levy community alive and keep cross faculty interactions between students.

Chloe Williams

 

I Support Experience CSU

Dear Concordians,

As president-elect of Casa Cares, I am writing to express my support for Experience CSU. Having worked with Melissa Payette (running President) and Sabrina Jorrin (running VP Student Life) at Casa Cares for almost a year now, I am confident that both will do an excellent job in representing the student body and better our University experience.

Since I joined Casa Cares in May 2013, I witnessed the consistent hard work of both Melissa and Sabrina throughout their mandate. Having Melissa as my president was a truly rewarding experience; her dedication, integrity and perseverance were a source of inspiration for our team and kept us striving for more.  I believe that her determination and strong desire to have a positive impact on the community make her the most suitable candidate to represent the Concordia student body, act as a leader and work in collaboration with a team to achieve visionary goals that will improve student life.

I had the pleasure to work with Sabrina over the past few months, and I was astonished by her creativity, ardour and enthusiasm. Not only was she approachable at all times, but she also managed to use all the resources that were available to her to contribute to the success of all our events. Her passion and commitment show a keen desire to build relationships with others and make their university experience memorable.

I am therefore confident that Experience CSU will do a remarkable job at making Concordia a distinct and unique university where life goes beyond the classroom.

Frédérique Bouchard

VP Communications of Casa Cares

President-elect of Casa Cares

Categories
News

Correction Notice March 18’14

On March 18’14, the article , “Updates from your Concordia Student Union,” presented incomplete and misleading information regarding the CSU Executives’ proposal to council regarding the motion to enter into negotiations with the university’s archives department for storage of the CSU’s documents. The paragraph should have read as follows:

“The CSU executive proposed entering into an agreement with Concordia’s archives department wherein the CSU would donate their archives to the department and give responsibility for the filing and maintenance of said documents to them. As the CSU currently has no unified means of archiving their documents, this would provide an ideal solution. The motion asked that the Council grant the executive permission to enter into a process of negotiation with the university’s archives department for the purpose of reaching an agreement whereby the CSU’s documents would be moved to the archives department. However, the executive was adamant that if given authority by the Council to pursue negotiations toward an agreement, they would not formally agree to anything without first bringing the agreement to council.”

The article also incorrectly attributed the following paragraph’s information to the CSU meeting on March 12. The 2014-2015 budget and President Shepard’s remarks did not take place at the council meeting, this item was discussed at the Board of Governors meeting.

“In total there were three items removed from the consent agenda including the finance committee report due to insufficient information regarding the 2014-15 budget. However,  according to President Shepard, by May’s meeting there will be more details available.”

Furthermore, the ‘Quebec firm,’ referenced in relation to a proposal regarding funding of a research project, should have said representatives from La FEUS (Federation Etudiante Universitaire de Sherbrooke).

 We sincerely apologize for having published this misinformation.

Categories
Opinions

Letters to the Editor

Concordia is a remarkable school, beyond the classrooms, because we have such a strong sense of community. The vibrancy of campus life here is apparent in ways I have not seen at any other school. A central component of the unique nature of Concordia, is our relationship to fee levy groups. These groups bind us together, support us, and enrich our education and experience at university. However, they are under threat by the per-faculty fee levy referendum question.

By treating fee levies as a faculty issue, we ignore the fact that people benefit from these groups regardless of their faculty. Currently, we vote yearly as a school on whether we will support fee levy increases. If people want to opt out of these fees, they are free to do so. However, if a faculty were to opt out, they would switch the orientation to an opt-in system, where people must be individually solicited for their donations. These fee levy groups would no longer be just student funded service, interest, and advocacy groups. They would be charities.

Further, one could ask, would these organizations stop providing services to faculties that opt out? Would Gender Advocacy stop providing support for assault victims of those student bodies? Would People’s Potato or the Greenhouse start demanding transcripts proving what department we belong to? Would CUTV, The Link, CJLO, or The Concordian refuse news and entertainment to those students? No, because that isn’t how these groups work. However, they would be pushed to divert funds and resources away from providing services that make Concordia such a fantastic place, to ensure their now precarious survival.

Andrew Weizman

Per-Faculty Fee Levy No Campaign

Undergrad at School of Community and Public Affairs

 

Vote ‘No’ to Per-Faculty Fee Levy Referendums in Upcoming Election

In the upcoming CSU elections, students will be asked to vote on a proposal for per-faculty fee levy referendums. As a Concordia student who has gained so much from fee levy groups over the years, I am very concerned by the devastating effect this proposal will have on the vibrancy of our university. Fee levy groups like the People’s Potato, QPIRG Concordia, Le Frigo Vert, and many more, play an essential role in creating an environment where students can become engaged in their campus and in the greater Montreal community. These groups are run by and for students. They provide a host of services, events, and campaigns that directly benefit students of all faculties, who both access the groups’ services and participate in their events, while gaining invaluable learning experiences as volunteers, board members, and employees at these organizations.

Of course, not every student will access the services of every fee levy group while at Concordia – some people will get involved with the Concordia Volunteer Abroad Program, but may never access the peer support service offered by the Center for Gender Advocacy. They may want to get their hands dirty at the Concordia Greenhouse or listen to CJLO radio, but they might never take in a free documentary on Monday night at Cinema Politica or participate in QPIRG’s community-university research exchange project. It is this diversity of interest, however, that makes Concordia an exciting place to study – and the support we give to this diversity is what makes our community strong.

The proposed per-faculty fee levy referendums will put the strength of our community and the stability of fee levy groups at stake. By allowing per-faculty referendums instead of united student referendums, fee levy group funding will be compromised and students will be falsely divided and prevented from accessing these amazing organizations. I urge Concordia students to support a united and vibrant campus community and to vote ‘NO’ to the per-faculty fee levy referendums on March 25, 26, and 27.

Fiona Ainsworth studies chemistry at Concordia and is a collective member at Le Frigo Vert.

 

For the past four years I have had the pleasure of getting to know Chuck Wilson as a mentor, a colleague, and a friend. Since the day we met, I have had the utmost respect for his knowledge, work ethic and passion. I wholeheartedly believe there could not be a better candidate for CSU President.

The one thing that unites all Concordia students is our desire for a great education. Chuck was a Senator for two years, has been a department student representative and has sat on a variety of academic committees. He takes it upon himself to listen to students, identify their concerns then find the most effective way to make a positive impact on our programs, spaces, and resources. Chuck knows how to improve our academic curriculum, rights and experience because he’s been doing it for years.

I worked alongside Chuck as an Engineering and Computer Science Association (ECA) executive last year. In his role as VP Finance, Chuck was determined to make sure every single penny was accounted for. His work was the foundation for a complete overhaul in the ECA’s financial structure. Once his mandate was over he stuck around to oversee the changes the whole way through. Because of his work, the ECA’s finances will be easier to manage and thus spent more effectively for years to come.

Chuck cares about the things that matter. Our executive team decided that it was critical for the ECA to become legally accredited in an effort to secure its future. Chuck was key in creating and executing the ‘VOTE YES’ campaign. This campaign saw 1,675 of our approximately 3,400 student members voting in favour of the referendum. There was a 50 per cent voter turnout and 96 per cent of those ballots were in favour. The results speak for themselves.

Sometimes it seems like Chuck knows everything. You need a robot? Chuck will build one. You have a technical issue? Chuck will fix it. You need a balanced budget? Call on Chuck. You need a drummer? Chuck can rock out. An updated policy, a website, help understanding circuit systems? Chuck’s your man. But, the really awesome thing about Chuck is when he doesn’t know something he tackles the challenge head on and doesn’t quit until an acceptable solution is reached. All the while, keeping a beard-framed smile.

It’s easy to make promises, but it’s a lot harder to fulfill them. Chuck doesn’t talk about doing things. #chuckdoesthings

– Allison Hipgrave

 

Dear Editor:

As a fellow student I would like to reach out to all Concordia students, but particularly students in Fine Arts.

In the upcoming CSU elections there will be a question that asks whether or not you agree with per-faculty fee levy referendums. It’s important for people to know the full impact of this question, and why voting ‘NO’ is so important.

For those that don’t know, the Art Matters Festival is a fee levy group. We couldn’t do what we do without the stability and funding provided by a stable fee levy. With it, Art Matters has become a renowned and unique arts festival in North America.

Fine Arts students should know that the exact same people who were pushing for the current per-faculty fee levy referendum also tried to push for an immediate 20 per cent cut to Art Matters funding (as well as five other fee levy groups) by asking for John Molson School of Business students to opt-out en masse. This was done without any consultation or discussion with the people directly concerned.

Per-faculty fee levy referendums have the potential to destroy the sense of community at Concordia that fee levy groups and related projects cultivate. Art Matters is not exclusive to the Fine Arts, it is for the Concordia community at large, just like the Sustainable Business Conference is something Fine Arts students and all students can attend and learn from. After all, Art Matters is called “Art Matters” because it is not solely for other artists, but for everyone.

I feel Fine Arts students in particular should be coming out in large numbers in the upcoming CSU elections, to defend Art Matters, to defend fee levy groups, and to defend the values of a Concordia community. Please visit www.ConcordiaCommunity.org for more information.

Thank you,

Coey Kerr

Faculty of Fine Arts, BFA

 

A Better Loyola

In the past two years my frustration with the limited food options on the Loyola campus has been increasing exponentially. If I wasn’t able to bring a lunch to school, I was forced with the daunting decision of purchasing a salty, frozen soup, a heavily processed and pre-packaged sugar laden muffin form Chartwells, or possibly a flavourless, vegetable-less helping of lentils or pasta from the free lunch. Having daydreamed of fresh, home-cooked, sustainable food options in a welcoming, comfortable space I decided I needed to find an answer to my dilemma. I heard of the Concordia Food Coalition (CFC) conference and Transitions, and decided to venture to the downtown campus with the hope of meeting like-minded people, people who cared about healthy, sustainable food. That day changed the rest of my student life at Concordia. That was the day I met Gabriel Velasco (as well as many other wonderful new friends). I immediately became involved with the CFC, and along with Gabriel, decided to start meeting at the Loyola campus to assemble a crew that would try to change the current food system situation.

Gabriel is a passionate, level-headed, easygoing guy, who truly wants to make a substantial (and sustainable) difference in our Concordia community. Learning how much headway had already been made with the Hive Café, I was impressed to say the least. Loyola is a barren food wasteland, and he and the rest of the Community Matters team intend to change that. In the short time I’ve come to know some of the members of this team, my faith in sustainable food options at a university has been renewed. The Hive café project this team will make happen is just a small piece of the puzzle they intend to construct over the next year. With plans for a greenhouse and another café in the hall building, they have their work cut out for them. I have complete faith that these changes will be made and that the progress this team will incur will bring Concordia back to the community it has strayed from in the past couple of years. Gabriel, and the rest of the team, has a deep understanding of how important community and solidarity are to making these projects realities. I implore you to go out and vote for Gabriel for VP Loyola (and the rest of the Community matters team) his focus and drive will not wane, changes will be made, and Concordia will be one giant step closer to a healthier, richer student body.

– Paige Hilderman

 

I started an undergrad in accountancy this January, and I already love being a John Molson School of Business (JMSB) student. I’m also voting ‘NO’ to per-faculty fee levy referendums in the upcoming CSU elections (March 25-27).

When I learned that the referendum was happening, and that some students in my faculty pushed for it at the last minute, I was quite shocked. Never did any of the proponents of this issue make the case properly to JMSB students about why this was so urgent.

I would like to state for the record that JMSB students are not united on this issue. Many of us are glad that fee levy groups exist and we access their services regularly, whether that be the Concordia Volunteers Abroad Program or the People’s Potato. These groups are part of what makes Concordia so great and I’m proud to support them. Plus, groups like Le Frigo Vert, CJLO and the Sustainability Action Fund have a positive impact on the Montreal community at large, and build the reputation of our university as vibrant and dynamic. Fee levy groups offer all students volunteer, internship and job opportunities, as well as the experience of running a not-for-profit corporation. The years of work that have gone into building these resources will be undermined with per-faculty fee levy referendums. We all could lose so much.

Community means supporting things even if you don’t always directly benefit from it. We do so because we know that building community support systems build better societies. Per-faculty fee levy referendums destroy this idea in favour of a cold ideological vision that says, “If I don’t directly benefit, I don’t care.” The existence of projects like CASA Cares and the Sustainable Business Group’s, Business Beyond Tomorrow Conference, which are fundamentally premised on the idea of social responsibility, prove that JMSB embraces an ideology in support of community.

I’m glad that within JMSB there’s a sense that we are part of a larger community and contribute to it. CASA Cares, JMSB cares, and I feel the overwhelming majority of Concordia students care as well. We should stay united as students in defense of services that mutually benefit us all, and make Concordia an interesting place to learn. I encourage my fellow JMSB students, and all students at Concordia, to vote ‘NO’ to per-faculty fee levy referendums and to visit ConcordiaCommunity.org for more information on this important issue.

Laura Macdonald, Accountancy, John Molson School of Business (JMSB)

 

I’m writing to my fellow students in all faculties to strongly urge all Concordia undergrads to vote ‘NO’ to per-faculty fee levy referendums during the CSU elections on March 25-27. I don’t usually get involved with elections so directly, or even write letters like this, but the specific ballot question about fee levy groups is an unfair attack on the integrity of some incredible organizations that I know well like the Center for Gender Advocacy and QPIRG Concordia that, along with other fee levy groups, are very accountable to students while doing great campus and community organizing work.

I even joined the “Vote No” committee last week, and it’s been great to work with students from all faculties. Our committee includes the active participation of students from Arts & Science, Fine Arts, the John Molson School of Business and Engineering and Computer Science. In other words, our committee represents student unity, not the divisions that happen with per-faculty referendums. I feel our committee represents the potential of what students from all faculties can accomplish when we work together.

Students should check out ConcordiaCommunity.org, the website of the “Vote No” campaign for more details. Maintaining student unity when it comes to fee levy groups is an important way to maintain the strength of Concordia’s student community as a whole.

Thien Viet Quan

Fine Arts

 

All students benefit from Fee-Levy groups: Vote ‘No’ for the Per-Faculty Fee Levy Referendum Question

After reading last week’s issue of The Link about the upcoming vote on having per-faculty fee levy referendums (Vol. 34, Issue 23: “Stronger Together” and “No Remuneration Without Representation”), it only confirms my thoughts.

The articles were written by a John Molson School of Business (JMSB) and Arts & Science student, showing that these fee levy groups are available for everyone, no matter one’s degree or faculty. In the article in favour of fee levy groups, I thought the following quote was pertinent: “Fee levy groups also provide benefits to all students outside of the diverse services, events and campaigns they already offer in the way of volunteer, internship, job and mentorship opportunities. Participation in a fee levy group means hands-on experience in running a not-for-profit corporation, which is an immensely valuable experience for any student to have.” This is especially true for me being an international student at Concordia in the Geography, Planning & Environment department for the past three years and now working as the CURE Coordinator for the Winter 2014 term. I’ve had many opportunities to volunteer with several on-campus organizations, whether it’s helping do bake sales for Sustainable Concordia or getting signatures for the Concordia Food Coalition’s (CFC) fee levy question, and now have the chance to actually be paid by Concordia University under the Work-Study Program grant.

Its article shows that students from all faculties do actually work together – for example, JMSB students have been board members or staffers at Art Matters, the Centre for Gender Advocacy, CUTV, the Community Solidarity Co-op Bookstore, Concordia Volunteer Abroad Program, The Concordian, QPIRG Concordia, the Sustainability Action Fund and Sustainable Concordia.

Supporting fee levy groups is agreeing with the idea that we, students of Concordia University, are part of a larger community. In any community, individuals might not use all of the services that are offered; not everyone watches CUTV or a Cinema Politica film on Mondays, listens to CJLO, volunteers abroad with CVAP, or uses the Centre for Gender Advocacy, however, that doesn’t mean these are not important resources to have. We should still support all the 17 different fee levy groups and the various services they provide since these last improve the lives of not only students but also the lives of other members of the community.

Hopefully you will all agree with me on this point. Students should get informed before signing or voting for things, and make sure they realise the consequences these decisions engender – remember, vote ‘NO’ at the upcoming per-faculty fee levy referendum between the 25-27 of March.

William Butcher

The Community-University Research Exchange (CURE) Coordinator (as of Winter 2014)

Letter of Endorsement for Benjamin Prunty for The Link and The Concordian

I fully support Benjamin Prunty and his team, Community Matters, for CSU executive next year. Having worked with him recently as a main organizer for the Concordia Transitions conference, I know that he is the best candidate for the job. Last October, Benjamin proposed an idea for a student conference that would build momentum towards change in the food system at Concordia. With Benjamin as our leader, we were an incredibly effective team. Concordia Transitions – building a food system from farm to plate – was a huge success because of Benjamin’s leadership, hard work, and dedication.

Student government should not only initiate change, but finish what they start. It’s not an easy task but Benjamin has proven that he is very much capable of doing so. This is really why my vote is going to Community Matters. Above all, I want a student government that follows through with projects, ideas and represents what students want and need. I believe Benjamin Prunty and his team are organized, well intentioned, incredibly smart and innovative. A qualified team with a leader you can count on.

– Alix Tabet

It is with pleasure that I write to express my political support of the Community Matters team running in the CSU Elections. My experience with three specific representatives exemplifies why this team has the skills to deliver their promises:

Benjamin Prunty was a spectacular asset to ASFA in 2012-2013. His commitment to transparency and ability to ask challenging questions made him a strong voice for all students. As a member of CSU Sustainability Committee, I see Benjamin as an inspiring leader, presenting interesting projects through passionate communication. He democratically utilizes the committee by allowing us to express opinions and concerns. Having attended many events where Benjamin has publicly spoken on important issues, I can attest that he is a talented orator and informed on many scales. I believe Benjamin’s valuable experience paired with humble presidential qualities resonate with what the Concordia student body deserves for the upcoming year.

Charles Bourassa demonstrates exceptional initiative on ASFA Council, being enthusiastic and motivated even when facing majority opposition. He has exemplified fortitude in thinking outside the box and persevering important topics – even forming and chairing ad-hoc committees to deal with contentious issues. Charles also sits on the CSU Sustainability Committee. Through this I learned of his strong values in education as academics and student engagement experiences. Charles possesses the unique quality of seeing the big picture and recognizing smaller flaws within the overall structure – this type of intuition is integral as a leader.

Jessica Cabana is a kind, well-rounded student. Representing LCSA on ASFA Council, she takes it upon herself to pursue individual projects performing research, later presenting her findings to council – this type of drive has the capacity to make major contributions in student-government. Outside of politics, Jessica is a Coordinator at Sustainable Concordia where I am actively involved as an intern. She maintains excellent relationships with peers and supervisors due to her outstanding level of professionalism which has gained her respect and admiration. Jessica has a wealth of knowledge and large sustainable networking base.

I admire all team members’ sustainable profiles and accomplished reputations: the aptitudes of these students shine brightly individually, and I can only anxiously anticipate their intellectual capacities as a team. Concordia is a community that needs capable leaders to ensure all needs are heard, therefore, I formally endorse Community Matters as I wholly believe this team has the strength to unwaveringly serve our student body.

Meghan Lamb

ASFA Chairperson

 

Why Community Matters

Community Matters. Let’s stop and think about these words for a minute. These are some pretty important buzzworthy words that are being tossed around by almost every platform. So, you have to ask yourself, which team actually has the ability to represent a community you want Concordia to look like? For me, the answer is glaring. We should be represented by a team that understands what it takes to implement, and has had experience in leading, community movements and making concrete steps in bettering the lives of students on campus.

Through their tireless efforts, the members of Community Matters have made everlasting contributions to the structure of student life on both campuses already. In my view, it only makes sense to see them continue this amazing work to make our university a space that represents who we are. They have all, in one way or another, contributed (and, in many cases, founded) very important work at People’s Potato, Divest Concordia, Concordia Food Coalition, Sustainable Concordia, The Hive Café, as well as a number of other amazing groups that fill the pages of this teams impressive CV. We are hearing a lot about what other candidates plan to do for our community once elected, but the Community Matters team has already planted the seeds of their platform and it will be exciting to see these initiatives grow and mature.

As you may have heard, there is also a referendum question put to ballot during these elections. A question asking whether you would like to see the decisions surrounding fee levy group funding be changed from its current state to a per-faculty vote was presented to the union for consideration. If passed, this decision will have profoundly negative effects on the way these student organizations operate, and in some cases, they may cease to exist entirely. Community Matters envisions a strong student community that is collaborative and gives each student the autonomy to engage in whichever way they wish. This includes having the opportunity to join any group or activity no matter what faculty you are in. So, instead of playing into these divisive politics they are even more motivated to work with fee levy groups in order to make sure every student on campus has the same enjoyable experience. This is the definition of leading. This is the result of experience, and this is why the decision is simple. Vote Community Matters!

Mark Underwood

 

Upcoming referendum on per-faculty fee levies: A call to vote “NO”

I am sympathetic to students who may have found themselves discovering a host of fees for initiatives that they have not had the fortune of learning about beforehand. However, this does not mean that the work that these groups are doing is not worth supporting. It is ironic that one complaint about fee levy groups is the lack of outreach, yet if this question passes, groups will have to consider limiting access to and/or flat out exclude certain students from partaking in their services and activities. The upcoming referendum question on per-faculty fee levies is not the way to address concerns about fee levies, because the work that these groups do is invaluable to the Concordia experience for many students. Many people come to this university because of the wide range of opportunities and experiences that fee levies provide, and I urge students to recognize how this contributes to the strength and vibrancy of Concordia’s campus.

The opportunity to volunteer and work at the Concordia Greenhouse is the reason I chose to remain at Concordia when I transferred from Studio Arts to Environmental Science. Since my arrival at the university in 2007, my student experience has been tremendously enriched with experiential learning, in such fields as horticulture and urban agriculture, collective management, and popular education. I have also been able to host hundreds of volunteers from all faculties, provide internship opportunities, and learn to host workshops to share what I had learned. This is all thanks to the Greenhouse. But last year, due to lack of funding, the Greenhouse was on the verge of closing down. Thankfully, we were fortunate enough to obtain funding through a fee levy, making it possible for us to not only continue offering amazing and unique opportunities to Concordia students, but to consistently plan and develop towards an even more exciting future. This would not be possible without the security that fee levy funding provides.

It is this consideration for the future that is absent from the vision of those who would divide fee levies per faculty. Consequently, I would urge students to vote down this referendum question so that we may have the opportunity to thoughtfully work together in addressing the concerns that you may have about fee levy groups. This is the vision that we propose: working together to forge a thriving student community full of diverse and thrilling growing opportunities.

– Stefanie Dimitrovas

Categories
Arts

Literary characters seek love

 

 

Categories
Music

Quickspins – Metronomy, Skrillex, The Olympic Symphonium

Metronomy – Love Letters (Because/ Elektra; 2014)

Since their 2011 studio release, Metronomy have been consistently writing and touring. In an interview with NME, multi-instrumental frontman and lyricist Joseph Mount said that their fourth and latest album, Love Letters, is probably their best yet. Lyrically, Mount’s prowess is undeniable, but sonically, the album does not necessarily bring anything new to their electronic alt-pop repertoire.The album’s makeup are the Metronomy signatures: drum machines, synth-keyboards, subtle funk-infused bass lines and Mount’s achingly endearing British accent. Love Letters ditches the experimental, sunny vibe found on their aptly named third album The English Riviera, and opt for a more stripped down, minimalist sound that borders on classic 1960s pop. Despite the lack of musical innovation, the album does carry some instant favourites; “I’m Aquarius” and “Reservoir” amongst others showcases the familiar Metronomy lyrical wit and ‘can’t-get-it-out-of-my-head’ melodic catchiness that will resonate with fans of the British alt-pop quartet.

Trial track: “I’m Aquarius”

Rating: 7/10

-Jessica Romera

 

Skrillex – Recess (OWSLA; 2014)

This is by far Skrillex’s best work to date. Sonny Moore, stage name Skrillex, has achieved huge success in the last two years, but this is the first piece of music that truly stands out as a masterpiece in the 26-year-old electronic music producer’s repertoire. There are significantly less collaborations with other artists, which is a shift from his previous productions. Regardless, the album still boasts some impressive cameos like Chance the Rapper and the Ragga Twins. Despite having released a ton of material since he emerged on the electronic scene, Recess is Skrillex’s first full length studio album. The wide variety of electronic genres like deep house and experimental EDM are interwoven to build the album and allow for Recess to sound like an experimental work of art. The tracks are not all pure dubstep dance tracks though; many of them stray from this specific form of EDM. The final few tracks off the album take an unexpected turn, but deliver on every level. Needless to say, this album will be the anthem to our summer parties and road-trips. Ultra original work.

Trial Track: “Fire Away”

Rating:11/10

-Jonathan Cohen

The Olympic Symphonium – Chance To Fate (Forward Music Group; 2014)

After emerging from New Brunswick’s growing music scene almost a decade ago, The Olympic Symphonium have brought their harmonic indie-folk sound across Canada and the Atlantic. For their fourth studio album, the three-piece collective enlisted the help of musician/composer/producer Joshua Van Tassel to create some of their most introspective lyrics and melodies to date. Touching mostly on heavier existential themes involving loss and religion, Chance To Fate is gracefully melancholic. The album opener “Seize The Day” sets up the tone for the rest of the 10 tracks with relaxed, crooning vocals and a soothing guitar chord progression to match. Chance To Fate comes impossibly close to personifying in sound that feeling you get when a long trip comes to a natural, satisfying end, and you’re just about ready for familiar, comforting surroundings that only home can provide.

Trial Track: “No Saving Grace”

Rating: 7.5/10

-Jessica Romera

Categories
Opinions

Longer hours for public transportation, not longer hours for bars

Financially and health-wise, students would benefit from extended metro times

On March 6, Montreal media announced that Mayor Denis Coderre had proposed extending last call until 6 a.m. One of the reasons cited, was Coderre’s concern for the safety of drinkers, (CBC News, March 6, 2014).

For students and other budget-conscious individuals, longer bar hours would mean they would have the option of taking public transportation rather than a cab or their own car. It would also negate those instances where drinkers wander around aimlessly until the metro opens because they can’t afford a cab or are too drunk to drive.

It also stands to reason that  when people have time on their hands, are revved up on alcohol, while waiting to take the metro home, that they might engage in risky behaviour that could result in a trip to the emergency room.

If bars were open later, it would give drinkers a place to stay where there is less of a chance that they will do something that will get them hurt.

On the other hand, if bars are open later there is a greater chance that individuals will be encouraged to spend more money and thus save nothing by waiting for the metro to open.

Furthermore, there is a good chance that people will consume more than their usual amount of alcohol if bars are kept open later, which is both detrimental to their health and impacts their decision making capabilities which may get them in trouble.

Instead, what would help keep intoxicated trouble makers and cash-strapped individuals off the street at 3 a.m. is for the metro to stay open later.

At the moment, the metro stops running at most stations shortly after midnight on weekdays and shortly after 1 a.m. on Saturdays. Buses sometimes run a little longer but it depends where you are in the city. For example, the 24 which accesses downtown and NDG stops running around 2 a.m.This is problematic because it is around these times that most people begin their night. There is an all-night service but it is only in select areas and not as accessible to bar-goers as the metro. It therefore makes more sense to extend the hours of the metro and some buses to accommodate drinkers rather than keep the bars open late.

If safety is an issue as Coderre says, than safe transportation available for longer periods of time should be the priority and not longer bar hours.

This is also a proposition the CSU and the university administration should consider undertaking. It would be beneficial for students, not only for those who are drinking, but also for those students who take advantage of the library’s 24 hour service, for public transportation to be available all night. Rather than encourage a proposal that would see students staying up late, drinking more and spending more money, the university and the CSU should advocate for a safer, financially smart alternative to Coderre’s plan.

Exit mobile version