Categories
News

Starting the school year off green and nature-conscious

Year’s first major talk to feature stellar cast of environmental justice figures

The CSU’s first talk of the year on Sept. 3 will feature environmental journalist Bill McKibben and indigenous activist Ellen Gabriel discussing climate change and human rights in the only Canadian stop of the People’s Climate Tour, advertised as the world’s biggest climate change protest.

Scheduled alongside a New York City climate change summit to be attended by heads of state and policy-makers, the tour will be mirrored internationally in over a dozen countries. Hundreds of groups will be participating in a massive display of environmental mobilization seeking to pressure governments and corporations into rethinking environmentally-detrimental policies and projects.

One such group to have a strong presence at Wednesday’s talks will be 350.org (of which McKibben is a founding member), a global organization looking to limit the worldwide concentration of atmospheric CO2 to 350 parts-per-million — a figure widely considered the threshold beyond which destructive climate change is unavoidable. (The current concentration is 400 parts-per-million.)

Alongside a campaign to increase institutional divestment of fossil fuels, 350.org has long rallied grassroots action against, among other things, tar sands development and the transnational pipeline. Alongside the CSU, they’ve planned the event alongside the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) and the Divest chapters of both universities.

“If we have a mission at this point of time it’s to build a climate cross-movement not just on environmental issues, but working with labour, working with frontline indigenous communities [and] the communities dealing with the worst impacts of climate change,” said 350.org’s Tar Sands Organizer and onetime Concordia student Cam Fenton, who has handled publicity and media relations for the event.

Fenton says the choice of Montreal as a location was a natural one and that Canadian youth in general were particularly sensitive to environmental issues.

“Environmentalism cuts across all sorts of social issues, indigenous rights, worker’s rights, and is especially grounded in the sense that we’re talking about what will happen to our future,” he said.

Fenton believes the presence of the participants, McKibben and Gabriel included will serve as a powerful inspiration to all who attend.

McKibben, whose decades-long career and seminal 1989 work The End of Nature is seen by some as starting the public discourse on global warming, has long tried to raise public consciousness on the issue of man-made climate change and the increasingly important urgency to cease modern man’s destructive existence and move towards a sustainable, if humbler, lifestyle.

Gabriel, another Concordia graduate hailing from the Kanehsatà:ke Mohawk nation, first rose to international prominence as one of the spokespeople for the Mohawk protesters during the 1990 Oka crisis. She’s since campaigned for the revitalization of native traditions and rights and a greater inclusion of indigenous concerns in social and political discourse, and protested the expansion of tar sands pipelines.

“[Gabriel] has such a powerful voice when it comes to indigenous rights,” said Fenton, calling her a ‘frontline community voice in resistance.’

He said her knowledge would combine with McKibben’s reputation to make for a powerful strategy on account of the powerful position indigenous communities possess in terms of experience with environmental damage and the land rights enshrined to them by the Constitution.

“It’s not just something that can be solved by a single environmental organization,” he said.

Earlier this year the Supreme Court echoed this sentiment when it ruled in favour of a native rights claim by the B.C. Tsilhqot’in nation to 1,700 square kilometers of traditional land falling outside reservations. The ruling reiterated that any attempts by non-native entities to resource extraction over this land required explicit consent by its traditional inhabitants, effectively creating the possibility of veto powers by other indigenous nations over corporate and government-led development.

Fenton hopes the visit to Montreal will accurately transmits the urgent need for change to individuals curious to learn more and galvanize the determination of established environmentalists: “The decisions we make today [are what] the young people will have to live with; [they] see the urgency of action.”

The People’s Climate Tour will be held on Sept. 3 from 7 – 10 p.m at the H-110 Alumni Auditorium  of the Hall Building, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W. Tickets are free but limited in number. Consult http://350.org/peoplesclimatetour/ for reservations and attitional information.

Categories
News

A suit that doesn’t merely look smart — it is smart.

Concordian talent in quest to build world’s first smart-suit

Wearable devices are all the rage with future-friendly individuals. Think Nike fuel bands masquerading as innocuous bracelets until they flash your step count or calories, smart watches that can talk to you and Google Glass. The trend has so far been leaning towards unobtrusive technology that fulfills its role while eliminating clunky jetpacks and blinking lights.

Montreal’s Heddoko is a sleek new start-up banking on this idea of wearable technology, except instead of aiming small, they want to adapt it to a full-body experience by combining motion-capture technology pioneered by Hollywood and the gaming industry to create the world’s first athletic smart-suit.

By embedding motion sensors — originally used for the green screen or Wii — to precisely capture how your body is moving and combining it with some app wizardry, Heddoko’s smart-suit will help athletes know exactly how their exercise regimens are progressing and help make workouts better and more efficient.

CEO Mazen Elbawab has years of experience under his belt working for Ubisoft and Microsoft, not to mention a consulting career. He helped develop the Kinect system of motion sensing input devices that could read user movements and voice commands. The time spent perfecting such gadgetry also gave him a perspective on how to take it further.

“So far there’s only been information coming out of it,” said Elbawab, an athlete himself with a particular keenness for martial arts, whose passion for sport helped germinate the idea. “No one has tapped into giving something meaningful back and turning that information into knowledge.”

His invention probably won’t replace the physical presence and personalized expertise of a human coach, but it won’t be too distant of a second best. Just think: instead of trudging out on a cold winter’s morning to hit the gym or commuting to yoga practice, you’ll be able to slip into a comfortable smart-suit without ever stepping outdoors and have feedback on hand. That yoga pose or martial arts sequence? Your phone (or, supposedly, any compatible display) will tell you how to nail them both and offer the visuals and statistics to take things to the next level.

Ultimately, Heddoko has ambitious plans. The niche market at the moment will be athletes willing to spend an estimated $400 for the final product, but Elbawab believes there’s no reason why the technology couldn’t be adapted to the medical field — where the suit’s sensitivity could help with physiotherapy  and healing injuries — or beyond.

Though Elbawab agrees Heddoko has done much, the technological and business hurdles have been substantial. With the help of established Montreal entrepreneurs and investors, Elbawab’s team has ballooned to 15 engineers, businessmen and programmers. He has partnered with Concordia’s District 3, the meeting place for creativity, entrepreneurship and engineers to bandy about ideas, network and collaborate. “In a matter of four months we went extremely far. People usually struggle in building a first prototype,” he said. Heddoko’s proof of concept — a single working arm — managed to break it into the top three hottest inventions.

The group behind the Heddoko.

The technological side of things hasn’t been easy. “We can talk about the engineering difficulties for hours,” he said when prompted to elucidate. The range of conditions in which his invention would have to perform flawlessly is daunting. As anybody from a NASA scientist piloting a rover on Martian soil to a Vietnam veteran hoping his firearms don’t get jammed can tell you, everyday conditions can be the hardest to surmount — and the fancier the technology, the bigger the problems. A suit would have to perform as well in -20 celsius temperatures as 30 celsius, and be expected to go from one to the other, day in day out. A shirt can be washed to expunge the accumulated sweat and smells your body expels over hours — a mesh of circuits and sensors cannot. Another challenge has been optimizing sensor placements to their ideal points on the human body to accurately capture movement, a complicated task when you realize every part of our body is constantly changing in three dimensional space in relation to any other point.

While Elbawab admits much of the technology already exists on the shelf, that doesn’t mean it’s efficient or specialized enough for his purposes. Case in point: they’ve been in partnership with another start-up solely focused on the battery system that will deliver the juice to make the suit function. Elbawab hopes the ideal battery will have enough power on a single charge to last an entire week.

Finding investors will be just as difficult, if not more so. Speaking from experience, Elbawab knows the product, no matter how attractive, won’t sell itself.

“I went back and forth a lot,” he said about his strategy to bring in money. He tried selling the technology, appealing to potential buyers on his level, the level of gadgetry and technical ingenuity. He said people didn’t understand it. Only when he found a way that enabled his listeners to relate on the athletic level did he get the support no amount of cool technology could. It was a matter of speaking to people on their own level, and knowing the right people. “You have to know what problem you’re trying to solve with that technology,” he said, and outlines how he envisions, in his words, democratizing the gym lockers of athletes with a technology that has up until now remained confined to Hollywood.

Thankfully, Montreal’s prime location as an attractive hub of software and programmers will make things easier. District 3 has given him the chance to attract many talented young individuals, Concordians above all, to his project in exchange for the mentoring and intense start-up workload regular interns wouldn’t get in large corporations.

There are further challenges ahead. “Once we get to the prototype level, 99 per cent of the innovation will come from the software,” said Elbawab. He aims to finalize a functional prototype by the end of 2014 and launch a crowdfunding campaign. Until then, Elbawab is performing market research to determine which crowdfunding platform will be ideal for his purposes, and said Montreal will be the first place to have access to the suits.

Gelato darlings hot on ambition

Entrepreneurs hope invention will have world appeal

Dunham, Quebec’s gelateria Steffanos will behosting a free wine-themed gelato and sorbet event on Aug. 30 to highlight the region’s celebrated wines and to draw attention to the owners’  ambitious crowdfunding campaign for their newest invention, the Congelato.

Stéphane Boivin & Karen Côté

Stéphane Boivin and current Concordia student Karen Côté, the owners, had to find an imaginative way to deal with a very specific problem. The Congelato was designed as a portable food display to keep food cool for long periods of time without electricity and came about when Côté was invited to a summer festival but couldn’t afford the expensive and bulky equipment necessary to keep gelato from melting. Seeing it as a challenge, Côté modelled a rough idea of compartmentalized ice packs using Play-Doh. The two soon saw that they were on to something.

“Concordia’s been a big part of our success. Huge,” she said of the long and difficult process of finding the expertise and money to help make the Congelato a reality. Concordia’s Associate Dean of Academic and Student affairs George Kanaan and Principal director of Special initiatives Joe Capano were singled out in particular by Boivin for their dedication and help, as was Concordia’s Small Business Support Network that helped them with research and business plans.

“They were instrumental in harnessing and gathering support. Concordia has always been there. They have great facilities for spreading the word.”

The prototype was unveiled at a Dragons’ Den audition at Concordia last year which was won due to Concordia’s support in the Love your Local Business contest. The final commercial version, which was created over the winter months with the help of a professional designer, will be unveiled at the event.

Though presently destined for food, they’re already planning to take it in other directions.

“[Concordia] told us: ‘if you only use it for ice cream, your market will be very small. You have to incorporate other things,’” Boivin said. Eventual uses could be biomedical and pharmaceutical (certain drugs and medicines need to be stored at low temperatures, hampering their effectiveness in tropical places without electricity), or more mundane uses like keeping refrigerators stay cold during power outages. “There’s so many applications for this in the world.”

Now Steffanos is hoping to harness Concordia’s love for their creation into the critical momentum needed to make the Congelato marketable.

Started barely two seasons ago by Côté and Boivin, Steffanos has won a host of awards starting with the Best Service Award at Quebec’s Entrepreneurship Awards and a first place at the Love your local Business contest organized by Quebec’s Community Economic Development and Employability Corporation (CEDEC). Most recently the pair learned that travel website Tripdvisor.ca has rated Steffanos the second best Quebec restaurant out of a list of almost 13,500 entrants.

“It’s because when people come to Steffanos, they feel completely welcome, they feel loved, and every gelato and panini we make has love in it. They recognize that,” said the irrepressibly upbeat and energetic Boivin, who said many of her best customers come from hours away and often stay for hours more.

The gelateria came about one sweltering summer as Boivin and Côté were working long shifts at their factory job. Exhausted by the repetitiveness of the conditions, they realized making boxes on an assembly line wasn’t what they wanted to do with their lives.

“Stéphane  came to me and said, ‘what do you think about opening up a gelateria?” recalled Boivin.

His previous experience in marketing and Boivin’s history of entrepreneurship and a background in commerce and creative writing was enough to get them started. Soon they’d flipped a commercial property bought in Dunham into a gelato powerhouse, but it wasn’t without hard work and patience. They took a gelato-making class to start off and embarked on a year of busy research, fundraising, and some very judicious purchasing of second-hand equipment on Kijiji: a batch freezer, originally priced at $40,000, bought for $4,000; $6,000 displays purchased for half that; and a $30,000 espresso machine bought at $450, among others. Boivin said only one piece of equipment was bought new, and they did the renovations themselves whenever they could. From the very beginning, their business found a ready clientele, with Côté  making the gelato and handling communications and Boivin serving customers and taking care of business matters.

“It’s not just the gelato; it’s the service, it’s the ambiance, it’s everything together and the whole package,” she said.

Dunham is located in Quebec’s Brome-Missiquoi region straddling Quebec’s Wine Route and is known for its vineyards and grape varieties. It’s about 90 kilometers south-east of Montreal.

Steffanos address is 143 Bruce Street, Dunham. The free wine-themed gelato and sorbet event will take place on Saturday, Aug. 30 from 11am to 6pm, rain or shine.

Categories
News

Concordia’s Board meeting: SEL changes, copyright renewals

Major revisions to School of Extended Learning coming and major savings to copyright fees already here

In an otherwise quiet open session of the Board of Governor’s meeting on Wednesday, two big announcements were made concerning Concordia’s School of Extended Learning (SEL) and the university’s renewal of its collective copyright agreement.

School of Extended Learning

The board agreed to significantly revise the SEL’s mandate after concerns that it was struggling to meet its obligations to its student body constituency and competing with other faculties. SEL was created several years ago to oversee continuing education students as well as those suffering academically and taking independent studies by offering alternative services and aid.

Observers found however that SEL’s current model clashed with established faculties. This effectively led to an unnecessary reduplication of efforts and expenses that made the program academically and fiscally untenable, especially with regards to continuing education.

“I think there’s a sense in the community that we needed more clarity about the mandate and that the mandate needed to be revised: that we were confusing the Continuing Education function of the university, which have historically been strong and something we’re proud of, with a work with independent students and the students who were in academic distress,” University President Alan Shepard said.

“Under the same umbrella [you had] two things going in two different directions, and one was financially subsidizing the other. We’re basically putting back what we had prior to the last reorganization,” he said, adding the students in SEL could be better helped in other ways.

While transition plans are being arranged, Shepard said the changes coming from the mandate alteration were not something accomplishable overnight. To better aid the three often very different student profiles SEL served — independent students aiming for a certain faculty, continuing education students struggling academically, and a small section of individuals truly pursuing independent, unaffiliated studies — a rewinding of the clock to an earlier, continuing education model may be required, such as by limiting or eliminating credit courses offered and advising students who did not meet prerequisite criteria to gain them at the CEGEP level. Additionally, individual faculties would take on the responsibility with monitoring and advising students in academic distress or wishing to enter their faculties of choice.

Copyright changes

The board also announced the successful renewal, at a significantly lower fee from previous occasions, of Concordia’s agreement with Quebec’s copyright licensing organization, COPIBEC. COPIBEC, our equivalent of Canada’s Access Copyright, collectively negotiates between publishers/creators and organizations for the creation and renewal of licenses allowing for the lawful reproduction of copyrighted work necessary for things like photocopies, document access, and course packs.

Concordia’s fee for the next few years, previously at 90 cents per student per credit, was renegotiated at a 45% savings and reflects the tumultuous changes in collective copyright agreements after recent court cases expanded definitions of research and education fair-dealing —  considered exempt from copyright fees under Canadian law — and caused some universities to consider ceasing their renewals altogether.

Shepard said Concordia chose the safer route because it did not wish to go down the road of schools like York University, which deemed the court offered them enough leeway, did not renew their licenses, and now faces protracted and hefty lawsuits on behalf of Access Copyright’s clients. Shepard said York’s court case, destined to be slugged around for a long time and at great cost, had made it an unenviable test subject stuck in a difficult position.

“It’s been something universities have been really worried about and seized with in the last several years. I’ve dealt with this in the last three places I’ve worked in,” said Shepard, referring to copyright issues in academic settings.

 

Categories
News

Queer Concordia bows to anti-Israel pressure

Event exploring LGBTQ experiences in Israel proves too hot to touch

It was meant to be non-political snapshot of Israel’s sexual minorities for the purpose of fostering dialogue and widening viewpoints. Yet the documentary ‘Out in Israel’, hosted by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) and featuring noted speaker and activist Jayson Littman, instead caused protests and a last-minute pull-out by sponsor Queer Concordia.

“As soon as the event went live [on Facebook], people went nuts. There were really inflammatory posts, there were accusations of pinkwashing, and very very quickly the topic shifted from LGBTQ rights to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict,” said CAMERA fellow, Concordia student, and event organizer, Michelle Soicher.

Pinkwashing is a term that refers to when a corporate entity or state brings attention to its LGBTQ-friendly policy for the purpose of drawing attention away from other abuses. In the past, Israel has been accused of pinkwashing to distract from its track record with Palestinian human rights. Littman, an activist in both Jewish and gay communities and a worker with the organization A Wider Bridge, was on hand to speak of pinkwashing and Israeli LGBTQ experiences in general.

The pressure caused Queer Concordia, invited to co-sponsor the event as it touched upon issues of interest to its membership, to pull out.

The event carried on as scheduled only to be intruded on physically by a small group of very vocal protesters, allegedly claiming to be affiliated with Queers against Apartheid, a group in solidarity with Palestine. For some half hour or so, the dozen or so individuals chanted and protested before leaving.

“What I expected was a bunch of people with contrasting views. I expected a great Q&A,” Soicher said in reaction to the disruption, clearly disappointed with the protesters who hadn’t stayed for the event and left as swiftly as they came.

Though Soicher insisted the event wasn’t political, she did have an opinion on pinkwashing.

“The LGBTQ rights in Israel are the results of LGBTQ fighting for them. They weren’t handed to [them] — you can’t create a culture of tolerance to distract from something else. As Jayson [said] it, Israel sells itself as LGBT friendly for tourism [purposes] and nobody is distracted from the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.”

When reached for comment, Queer Concordia reiterated the negative reaction to the event was behind their cancellation.

“After discussing the situation as a board and considering the feedback we received from other on-campus organizationswe work closely with, we decided participating in this event would not be a good representation of our organization,” said Queer Concordia Communication Coordinator Emmett Anderson. Other QC members were unable for comment.

Despite the negative attention, Soicher said it is important to have such conversations, despite their sensitive nature, in an effort to give depth to what she calls “a very complicated, long-standing conflict.”

“I think Concordia students owe it to themselves and owe it to the student body to have two sides — at least — of what’s going on.”

The Concordian attempted to reach Queers against Apartheid but received no response.

Categories
News

Anti-PQ anger on the eve of election

Protesters don’t mince words over PQ policies

Activists and politicians assembled Friday afternoon at Premier Pauline Marois’ doorstep on the corners of McGill College and Sherbrooke Street to show their anger and disappointment at what they consider the rising state-sanctioned exclusion against Quebec’s religious, linguistic, and ethnic minorities.

Conceived by Canadians for Coexistence (CfC), a group advocating for full Canadian inclusion, only a handful of the planned 200-some individuals came out to brave the wind and the rain. Although the weather might have chilled bodies it certainly failed to dampen the fiery rhetoric.

“We’re a group that believes in diversity in inclusion and the PQ is against our beliefs. They’re a group that very clearly believes in exclusion and division,” said founding member Norma O’Donnell, highlighting in particular the rights of Quebec’s religious and anglophone minorities.

When asked on her thoughts as to why anglophone rights aren’t more visible, she said there were many reasons; from sympathetic francophones who remain quiet because of social pressures, to an inability to connect with students.

“It’s seems like students in Quebec are more concerned about their tuition than their rights and freedoms, which is extremely disappointing,” she said about the number of youth protesters, and referring to the recent Charter of Values which would prohibit ostentatious religious displays and clothing by government employees, and last year’s failed Bill 14, which would have strengthened the primacy of the French language.

“We’ve spoken to students, we’ve encouraged them to participate in these rallies. Students don’t seem to be interested … and that’s where we have to try and bring the two together.”

Photo by Keith Race

Though interviewed well before Monday’s elections, O’Donnell said that one way or another, whoever wins, her group’s ambitions were only just beginning.

“Canadians for Co-Existence, as well as several of our other groups, are very much going to be working alongside these politicians … because we don’t plan to accept the same-old, same-old. We plan to see that whichever party gets into power, that things will be very different. We’re not going to be the same old Anglo groups who sat by quietly and let this happen.”

Echoing O’Donnell’s sentiments was Montreal’s Reverend Darryl Gray, former Kansas state senator and head of English rights group, Alliance Quebec, and current pastor of the Imani Family and Full Gospel Church.

“The reality that there needs to be a stronger voice in the anglophone community is something that concerns me. I think there are those who acknowledge that the PQ government has failed the anglophone community, it has failed communities of faith, it has failed students, it has failed people in ethnic and cultural communities. I think that somebody needs to show up and stand up and speak up,” said Gray.“I’m not concerned about the Bills themselves. It’s about the mindset that would create such a thing.”

Gray, who says he has supported civil rights movements for decades, was careful to draw distinctions and not paint everyone with the same brush.

“There are many people in the PQ … that do not submit or believe in the policies and the behavior and the attitude of their leadership. I think that it’s important to say that. But, having said that, the leadership too often reflects and speaks on behalf of the body — and that is unfortunate.”

“I’m not here to represent the Liberals, or the Green Party, or the NDP. I’m here to represent the person who best speaks to the human condition. Mrs. Marois will have to understand that she’s going to have to stop running away from Montreal, that she’ll have to embrace Montreal for the diversity that it is. I’m here because I need to be here, I’m here because I want to be here.”

Additional speakers included, amongst others, Green Party leader Alex Tyrell and Muslim community activist, Salman Shabad Saidi, who organized Montreal’s first World Hijab Day back in February and has been, like Tyrell, a very vocal critic of the Charter.

“When they introduced the ban on religious symbols, I began to see what direction they [the PQ] were headed,” said Saidi of his motivations. “They were […] laying out the platform for the right demographic — and by right demographic, I mean white, purlaine, speaking the same language.”

Saidi calls the PQ tactics cheap attempts at raising division for political reasons, and mocked Marois’ vision of Quebec.

“We have our own ideas that are based on tolerance, intelligence, diversity, and productivity,” Saidi said, adding that his strong words were necessary to reflect the very real undercurrents in Quebec which are only now beginning to be voiced.

“They’ve unleashed a campaign of hate and intolerance against minorities, [ and these tactics] never embodied any true Quebec values and went against much of the tolerance that this province has been showing.”

Categories
News

JMSB on fire at Happening Marketing 2014

Unexpected conclusion sends participants to cloud nine

As the rankings for each competition at Happening Marketing 2014 were announced, team John Molson heard their names, again and again, but each time shy of a podium finish. Judging from the way things stood at that moment, one might have been satisfied with a bronze finish, as in last year’s edition. Yet when the final call was made, John Molson found itself all the way at the top.

“There was just confusion all around,” said marketing student and competitor Miyoko Fulleringer about those initial seconds during which their win hadn’t quite registered yet.

“The organizing committee told us we came fourth in almost everything,” she said about the event, held this year at University of Laval in Quebec City.

Smaller in scope and size than competitions like the Jeux du Commerce, (which can have over a thousand students), the Happening Marketing case competition focuses on creating a more intimate, collegial atmosphere. This year, it hosted 10 universities.

Like all case competitions JMSB delegates participate in, the culmination was paved with many months of training whenever their schedules would allow. Coaches and students sacrificed many an hour in what constituted perpetual case competitions in miniature.

“There were a lot of late nights, weekends. We were here every night of spring break,” said Fulleringer, adding that Christmas vacation was no exception.

For Salar Molaei, a third-year accountancy student participating as part of the integrated marketing communications team, first place wasn’t everything.

“I believe that the competitions are much more than podiums and it is important to keep the big picture in mind. I know that JMSB did their best to support other schools and we went in with the mindset of having fun and getting to know people. Every school excelled and showed us that we would have to do much better to even have a chance to podium. I applaud everybody.”

And this, he says, made all that commitment worthwhile.

“The person I am today is not the same as I was when I first joined the delegation. In the past year, I have been under tremendous stress, I have learnt more than I have in my academic career, and I have met many students who have each shaped me to become a better version of myself. The experience that you gain as a competitor is something that I will take with me throughout my life and I would not change it for the world.”

So how did JMSB manage first?

“As much as we’re all there to compete academically, [the organizers] really try to encourage sportsmanship and everybody getting together,” said Fulleringer of the sport and social activities which sometimes weigh more than individual cases.

JMSB’s marks for sportsmanship aided them in gaining first place.

“Honestly, I can say it’s one of the best organized competitions I’ve been to and I’ve attended seven […] as a delegate, two as a volunteer, [and] one as an organizer,” she added, echoing the general consensus from other JMSB participants.

Molaei, himself leaving the case world with an upcoming graduation, had some last words for curious readers.

“Participate. Get involved. Stress yourself out and beat the lazy student out of you. The competitions will change you and make you dig deep to bring out the best in you.”

Categories
News

Provincial voting woes continue for Concordians

Election difficulties and advice on how best to deal with them

Concordia’s Michael Groenendyk can attest that voting nightmares aren’t reserved for students — it took him a week and a half, three trips, and many hours spent arguing, debating, and phoning before the matter was settled.

Like many others, Groenendyk’s careful efforts, which saw him bring his passport, a copy of his lease, and pay stubs, were initially insufficient to prove his domicile status, which, according to Quebec law, simply means calling Quebec as one’s primary place of residence for at least six months. If you are a domiciled Canadian citizen of adult age, you can vote in Quebec. The Concordia business librarian, originally from Nova Scotia, and his girlfriend were told to return with additional documentation.

Upon their return, they said they faced a hostile reception from a new, different clerk.

“He repeatedly asked us whether or not we were students. I told him I was a Concordia employee, not a student, and showed him my documentation. I also explained to him how difficult librarian jobs are to come by and, in moving to Montreal, it is my plan to live here permanently,” he said, perhaps alluding to the recent comments by Premier Pauline Marois which insinuated that consideration should be put on whether voters also have the intention of staying in Quebec.

After heated arguments, during which the official seemed to doubt Groenendyk’s girlfriend’s waitressing job as sufficiently permanent as well, Groenendyk was told their documents were sufficient for now, but needed to be further inspected.

Four days later, after the period to add names to the elector’s list had expired, they received letters telling them they had, in fact, not met the criteria. It was only after contacting several newspapers and his party of choice that Elections Quebec invited him to reapply during a special revision period using essentially the same documentation, plus income tax documents, that had been judged insufficient previously. He said he found this manner of decision baffling.

Alison Maynard, project coordinator of the English youth vote mobilization project, Vote it Up, said proving domicile status was a complex endeavor.

“Living in Quebec is not proof that you are domiciled in Quebec — especially if your permanent address is in another province,” she said.

Maynard advised that the best documents to prove one’s status are either a provincial income tax return, a Quebec driver’s license, a Medicare Card, or other provincial documentation stating your status as a Quebec resident.

She also said that fewer Anglophone voters have registered this time around, despite comments by certain Quebec officials of ‘voter fraud’ by an influx of out-of-province students. Maynard stated that the chief electoral officer’s reports of non-eligible students attempting to register are ‘greatly exaggerated’ and that media comments of fraud were ridiculous.

Groenendyk said he believed the fault to a large extent lies with the particular officials, who he believes wield too much power in the decision.

“The thing that worries me about this situation is how easily it is for one individual elections clerk to deprive somebody of their right to vote, and also the standards for the criteria for who is eligible to vote and who isn’t. Why is it that my documentation is okay for one clerk, but not okay for another?” he said.

However Groenendyk also said he still believes that the elections are inclusive, that they are trying to involve everybody, in spite of his experience and what other people are saying. “I do believe, [from] talking to Elections Quebec, that they are trying to run a fair election. I genuinely felt that the people I spoke to were trying to help me and [were] giving me a fair chance to demonstrate that I met the criteria to vote.”

Categories
Concordia Student Union News

Mixed bag for fee-levy groups as CSU Judicial Board rules on complaints

Groups try to challenge legitimacy and scope of referendum

The CSU Judicial Board (JB) rendered a decision on March 18 concerning complaints brought to it by several fee levy groups against the wording and legitimacy of the per-faculty fee levy referendum question,  and protocol irregularities.

The complaints, brought to the JB by the Quebec Public Interest Research Group (QPIRG), the Concordia Greenhouse, and the Center for Gender Advocacy, alleged the referendum questions are ambiguous and legally inadmissible when compared to provincial and university rules governing student associations and Concordia’s Student Union.

The first complaint, arguing that CSU membership referred to a singular undergraduate student body of voters unorganized by faculty and reasoned allowing individual faculties to vote would create “faculty-based distinctions” splitting CSU membership, was unanimously denied by the JB. The board reasoned the referendum affected groups with overlapping memberships and not the council itself; thus, any splitting occurring from a passing of the referendum question would not affect the CSU itself.

The JB said that “while the CSU has a duty to maintain a single and equal membership class it does not have the  responsibility to ensure that the membership in fee levy groups is not divided on a per-faculty or other basis.”

The second issue dealt with whether or not proper protocol was followed by the Council, whose regulations demand that “prior to any motion being voted [on] at Council that would affect space or funding of another student group outside of the CSU umbrella, the Council Chairperson must give a minimum five days notice to the group(s) concerned.”

The groups said that these documents, outlining the time, location, and agenda of the meeting, were never received for the March 14 session. In response, the Judicial Board unanimously ruled that the meeting did not concern space or funding, but the tallying of votes.

Only a complaint about the ambiguous nature of the original referendum question, in particular a clause tasking the CSU “to take whatever steps are needed to ensure,” with the “shortest delay possible,”  all future fee levy questions are asked and applied on a per-faculty basis, was successful. The clause was considered too broad and was removed, with the referendum question itself slimmed down and simplified.

Categories
News

Fee levy groups mobilize before deadline

Last minute outreach to student body before March 25 vote

“This is a pivotal moment in Concordia history,” is how Concordia Greenhouse coordinator Sheena Swirlz characterized the upcoming referendum that could potentially see a radical change come to how Concordia’s fee levy groups gain their funding.

In an effort to raise awareness, Swirlz was just one of many representatives from some half-dozen fee levy groups that set up tables and spoke to anybody curious enough to inquire as part of an informal information session on Thursday, March 20, at the Hive Cafe on Loyola campus.

On hand besides the Greenhouse were non-profit media organization Cinema Politica, food co-op Le Frigo Vert, student community research and resource group QPIRG, and Concordia’s radio broadcasting station, CJLO.

An upcoming referendum question would ask if individual facul- ties should have the power to decide whether or not to support fee

levy groups, which gain all or part of their budgets directly as a flat fee automatically levied on each student on a per-credit basis. Currently, defunding can only be decided by a university-wide vote of the entire student body, though students have the right to individually opt-out if they so choose.

The modifications, originally brought by John Molson School of Business (JMSB) CSU representatives, are said by supporters to be a more equitable and fair way of distributing the funding as it was unfair to expect some faculties to pay for services they did not use. The original list of fee levy groups, which JMSB wished to separate itself from, included Cinema Politica, CUTV, Le Frigo Vert, Concordia Food Coalition, Art Matters, and QPIRG, but would affect all groups new and old in the future if the referendum is successful.

Swirlz said the loss of financial security would run much deeper than slashed budgets. It would constitute a loss of what she referred to as institutional memory.

Letting go of professional staff, Swirlz said, leads to a loss of ac- quired knowledge and a sense of history gained by a group. Simply hiring a new staff down the line, no matter how motivated they may prove to be, does not make up for the value lost by letting go of long-term members, leaving groups permanently poorer for their loss.

Tave Cole and Alex Lee, two members of Le Frigo Vert, echoed the sentiment by pointing out that Frigo’s mandate of affordable, healthy, and ethical foods would be seriously harmed by the decision.

“I think it’s a misrepresentation,” said Lee of the idea that some of Concordia’s faculties claim their members do not benefit. “No faculty is monolithic,” he said, adding that Le Frigo Vert served thousands of non-students in addition to members of each faculty.

Throughout the afternoon the recurring theme was that far from a hyper-local influence beginning and stopping on campus, the influence of fee levy groups far outstrips school boundaries, and those thinking they might not benefit may underestimate the impact fee levy groups create in the greater community.

CJLO, beyond providing an immediate grounding in broadcasting, gives voice to commentators and musicians and an outlay to culture and the arts; Cinema Politica serves, as volunteer Elsa Donovan noted, as an alternative news source; Swirlz cited Greenhouse horticultural and agricultural workshops and skill building programs, as well as products destined for various Montreal locations in the form of produce or seedlings.

The representatives also pointed out the difficult situations that would be created if faculty defunding goes as planned: students would still have access to the services, but not pay for them. A person could broadcast and listen to CJLO or get in line at the People’s Potato.

“I think it’s something that concerns everyone, and isn’t faculty- specific,” said Ana Paula Castillo, a volunteer at Cinema Politica.

Lindsay Nixon of QPIRG agreed that whatever the result, a major hurdle to overcome was reaching greater student consciousness and creating an awareness of the services fee levy groups offered.

“I was hired as outreach coordinator specifically for this reason so … that we’re more visible on campus,” said Nixon. “Fee levy groups definitely need more visibility.”

Categories
News

Summary: Quebec provincial debate

Relatively even-toned, debate had surprises and a few fiery moments

Two hours was all the leaders of Quebec’s provincial parties had to sway voters to their particular vision of the province’s future, as the first provincial elections debate was held on March 20.

Broadcast by Radio-Canada and Télé-Québec in French with live English translation and moderated by journalists Anne-Marie Dussault and Sébastien Bovet, Parti Québecois’ (PQ) leader Pauline Marois, Coalition Avenir Québec’s (CAQ) François Legault, Québec Solidaire’s (QS) Françoise David, and Liberal leader Phillipe Couillard did their best to buttress their agendas and undermine the policies and track records of their opponents.

From the get-go, Couillard set up his party as the alternative to the present status quo when he bluntly asked viewers whether they wanted a referendum or a focus on the economy, health services, and education, alluding to the PQ’s stance on sovereignty.

Marois, especially combat- ive during the night, fought back throughout the debate by assailing the failings of the “Liberal years” before her party came to power, and painted the CAQ and QS as being out of touch.

Legault’s consistent stance was for lower taxes, privatization, and more ‘wiggle-room’ for the average Quebecer.

Though a healthy middle class, both economically and socially, was agreed to by all candidates as a criti- cal benchmark for Quebec’s growth, different ideas were touted as the way forward.

David insisted on green development and social care and, while she was perhaps the most composed candidate, she bared her teeth on more than one occasion, as when she pointed out the PQ’s reliance on petroleum was a blatant backtracking on their previous “ecologi- cal commitments.” This in turn allowed Marois to paint David as the leader of an environmental party and against job creation.

Ordinarily humourless, there were moments of levity. Marois claimed that, in addition to creat- ing jobs and restarting the economy, her party had “the best economic team…Quebec has ever seen in all its history,” to which Legault later pointed out that as the sole candidate with any business experience (having been a businessman before entering politics) only he could claim to have directly created jobs.

Sovereignty and the charter, the most headline-grabbing topics of late, were raised last. Here Marois toned down her outspoken views, perhaps as a calculated reaction to its oversaturation in voters’ minds.

However, continually cornered on the issue, Marois was finally forced by Legault, when he point- edly asked, “You have a duty to an- swer clearly: yes or no, will you call a referendum in the next mandate?” to respond with, “No [there will be no referendum]…as long as Quebecers are not ready.”

The second major part of the national identity issue concerned the Charter of Values; a proposal by the PQ that would see ostentatious religious displays by govern- ment employees, such as jewelry or headwear like hijabs and turbans, amongst others, banned. The PQ leader called it a guarantee of state secularism and human rights and a simultaneous preservation of religious equality, while her opponents called it needlessly discriminatory and an attempt at wedge politicking.

Overall, while the traditional crossfire between the heavyweights in the province — the Liberals and the PQ — took center stage, there was plenty of room for the newer parties (with less to lose, compara- tively) to score major points with blunt stances.

The debate marked the half- way point of the elections that end with a vote on April 7, 2014. The next and final debate is set for Thursday, March 27.

Categories
News

Selling sex: countdown to a better model

Concordia holds panel to discuss the challenges of how to best move forward

Four experts convened on Tuesday at a Concordia-organized event to weigh in, and argue for and against, various models Canada could take up in response to the recent ruling by the Supreme Court declaring the country’s prostitution laws unconstitutional.

The panel discussion, entitled “Canada’s Decriminalization of Prostitution: What’s Next?” and  moderated by McGill law professor Alana Klein, featured Robyn Maynard, outreach worker at Montreal’s Stella ; Stan Burditt, founder of Men Against Sex Trafficking; Sarah Mah of the Asian Woman’s Coalition Ending Prostitution; and Terry-Jean Bedford, former sex-worker and current dominatrix, activist, and one of the individuals who successfully challenged and overturned the prostitution laws last December.

The main event, divided between opening statements and a debate on panelist viewpoints, made apparent that while both sides agreed to the fundamentals – such as the ineffectual nature of erstwhile legislation and a lack of safety for practitioners – the devil was in the details.

Broadly speaking, Bedford and Maynard argued for decriminalization as the best way of bringing agency to sex workers and tearing down of the walls of stigma and silence surrounding the world’s oldest trade. For Bedford, state-sanctioned legislation and not state-regulation of consenting  acts between adults is the road to empowerment.

“In all the work that we’ve been doing to combat violence against sex workers, the laws have been a major impediment for people’s ability to defend themselves,” said Maynard about past legislative attempts to ban the practice.

In particular, they referred to New Zealand’s decriminalization methods as a model Canada could emulate.

The ability to publicly organize, negotiate, and run services, they explained, would facilitate safety standards and workspace regulations.  Prostitutes should not be seen as browbeaten, helpless individuals, and neither should their clients be perceived as automatic predators. Why, they asked, is selling one’s body for sex considered degrading, while selling it for all other forms of paid labour fully accepted?

In one emotional moment, Bedford recalled how sex is often bought by those who couldn’t get it by other means.

“A lot of men need us to be their voice,” said Bedford, calling sex as much therapeutic as it is carnal.

Mah and Burditt on the other hand see prostitution as inherently immoral, asymmetric in power, and abusive, particularly towards minorities and those without recourse to justice.

“We know that the women who are trafficked are overwhelmingly women of colour, poor women, and women from third-world countries,” said Mah, defining  it as ‘entrenched racism and sexism’ beholden to pimps and criminals. Both defended the so-called Nordic Model, a Swedish-born method that legalizes the selling but not buying of sexual services as a way to provide redress and compensation to those exploited while continuing to outlaw the actions of their exploiters.

“Prostitution is a form of men’s violence against women and is an expression of extreme gender inequality,” Burditt stated. Thus, he says, rather than giving them legal validity, “the proceeds of [exploitation], such as money, cars, and property, should be seized and the money used to fund programs used to help the recovery of those impacted. [The traffickers] should be designated as criminal organizations, because that’s exactly what they are.”

“Our group advocates for the abolition of prostitution as a profoundly racist form of violence against women and we formed to build awareness around the harms of prostitution,” said Mah.

Overall, as one commenter pointed out afterwards, the differences were between systems that encouraged economic and social incentives for a safe, willing, and orderly transaction of sex, versus a system punishing violent and illegal activity which denied sex workers their autonomy.

“We need to remind the public that sex worker’s voices need to be at the heart of this,” said Maynard. “It is not fair to sacrifice the lives of sex workers … as the way to achieve gender equality.”

Though mostly even toned and empirical, there were moments of emotion, most noticeably toward the end, and particularly by Bedford, sporting the steely resolve that has seen her fight on behalf of sex workers for two decades.

The event, preceded by finger food and drinks, was capped off by question and answer session featuring several high-caliber questions from the audience and an opportunity for the audience to purchase literature related to the discussion.

Exit mobile version