Categories
Arts

The legendary tale of Space-Chap

Written by: Andy Fidel, Jocelyn Beaudet, Milos Kovacevic and Saturn De Los Angeles

“Tally-ho gents!” the Englishman’s voice boomed in the auditorium.

Graphic Jenny Kwan

Our hero of the hour, the one and only Space-Chap, puffed on his electronic pipe as the murmurs of the audience died out.

The delightful gentleman twirled his moustache, adjusted his brown tweed jacket and cleared his throat. Amazingly enough, Victorian fashion had not gone out of style in the year 3000 like many predicted in the great hipster revolution of 2020. But this event was not about style, nor the proclamation of enjoyment before popularity. Rather, this was good ole fashioned storytime with some chums.

Today’s tale is of the greatest adventure that Space-Chap had ever undergone: meeting the evil space-god, whose name none dare speak.

“Now if you would please insert the spinal whirlygig into your interface sockets, we can begin this great tale once-anew, yes?” Space-Chap told the crowd.

The neural transmitters and nano-machines of the memory-imaging machine (trademarked to none other than Space-Chap himself) would give the audience an extrasensory experience, in order that they might  relive every moment of the chap’s delightful adventure.

Of course, the audience began hooking up the device to the tiny hole drilled into the back of their necks.

“If there are no questions then?” Chap asked, walking towards the enormous contraption on the side of the stage.

“I have one!” a tiny, impish man from the back of the crowd exclaimed. Our hero met his gaze quizzically, but said nothing.

“What is the name of this beast whose name you refuse to reveal?”

“Well, I dare not say, sir. The very pronunciation would curl your hairs before they fall out of your head, your eyes would melt. Each syllable of its evil name would doom another generation of your kin, and I warn you good sir, it’s name is endless, like the darkest recesses of the universe folded upon themselves into a single being,” Chap said, his eyes staring off into space.

“So you don’t know its name then?” the impish man asked.

“I didn’t feel the need to ask. We weren’t exactly out at a dinner party, exchanging pleasantries over tea, crumpets.”

All the chums collectively leaned back in their chairs. The spinal whirlygigs began to heat up as images of a boy holding a rocket launcher appeared in their minds’ eye. This was rapidly intercut with moments of static.

“Don’t you move,” said a boy’s voice. “Or I’ll shoot.”

Meanwhile, space-chap continued to tap his way across the stage. Making frequent clicking noises with his tongue. A smile creased the old man’s face like a rotten apple when his cane hit the contraption. He opened the safety latch — Click — and held a finger over the red button.

“I mean it,” said the boy. “I will shoot.”

The helmet was far too big for the boy. He had to tilt his head back to see from underneath. And the leather straps were too tight. Pinched his chin whenever he took aim. The boy shut his left eye, listening to the war outside his home. The splatter of machine guns and the rumble of tanks that made pebbles dance and the ground tremble under his feet. Right eye fixed on his opponent: the large chalk drawing on the kitchen wall. A tall, lanky beast with a large appetite for trees.

Ka-Poosh! Ka-Poosh! Ka-Poosh!

He puffed his cheeks out and blew air through his fish-lips at every dull click. A light chuckle caught his attention. The boy’s mother shook her head as she passed him and headed straight for the faucet on the wall. She plunged her hands under the water, scrubbed and said “Who you shooting at, Chap?”

Red water and a pair of teeth slipped into the sewer grate.

“The evil space-god.”

The evil space-god was oozing out from its little cocoon it had nurtured from the tonnes of industrial waste it had been eating. They were accumulated from an extinct artificial garbage island in the middle of the ocean that used to exist centuries ago. Those machine guns and heavy artillery were leftover armour from a bygone Fourth Millenium war that was dumped on to that smelly isle.

Carrying a venomous, phosphorous-coloured and dangerously hot acidic substance from its dozen of voluptuous disgustingly morphed tentacles that complemented its scary physique, the vicious monster went on a marathon spewing a gallon’s worth of this substance on its desired target — the young, rebellious, handsome lad.

“Mom, don’t look, let’s run!” the boy hollered, drenched from all of the cleaning sludge that was left undone.

“What the hell are you trying to do? Don’t be a reckless jerk! We need to dig ourselves out of here,” argued the mother, who was exerting her last inkling of energy left.

In a desperate and unnecessary move, the boy latched away from his mom’s hand and pulled out a really strange looking ancient plastic toy instrument from his bag.

It was a magenta-coloured keyboard guitar, keytar for short. Adorned with enamel-coloured hearts decorated all over, it was one of those odd fusion instruments from the modern Renaissance of the 1980’s. He played a disgusting teeth-seething melody that he learned when he was in elementary, reminiscent of autotune-infested music sung by the fallen western pop divas of the early 2030’s.

Irritating as one would expect it to sound, the chords coming from the keytar was emitting this supersonic power. Something that was 80 and a half millihertz strong. Something that the space-god, who had a penchant for really distasteful music, had a fond weakness for.

All those generations listening to his mom’s ancient and uncool vinyl records were beginning to pay off.

“Take that, you stinking piece of crap!” he exclaimed in an odd moment of euphoria equivalent to a musical orgasm, except he was having a ball killing that beast.

The space-god began to melt away, something that no one was expecting to happen.

The impish man frowned inwardly, initiating cascades of ripples on the projection screens that were his eyelids. Something was odd. He attempted to banish the sights, to no avail. The images refused to vacate his neural pathways, refused to give way to the locals.

“No, this isn’t right at all,” he said, recoiling.

He had partaken of reminiscences enough to know this choppiness, this disjointed static, narration was a roll of forged, flat consciousness. Had he experienced a single odor, a single texture through the young protagonist’s hands? If this was story-time, its teller was a mute.

To add to his umbrage was the image of the keytar, that shameful vocation of his in the theatre days before he had reinvented himself as a gentleman. The spinal whirligig, not content with being a fraudulent contraption, was actively co-opting of his own memories, pushing him Persian rugs woven with tawdry threads. Could the others see what he saw, or did they all hear a distinct song tailored exclusively for them by the false minstrel whispering inside their head?

“Trumpery! Trumpery I say!” he yelled, reaching backwards to clear his neural port. But his arms did not obey, tied as they were. Violently he shook his head until the thing fell out and the show’s curtains rose to no applause.

And what a site to find oneself in! The rumbling, interpreted as tanks, was actually the humming of an enormous contraption on the stage, next to Space-Chap.

Too late, he felt something dislodge and slip by the pocket fabric, leaving a lightness about his heart. And then, like sperm racing to the egg, the chain-tailed ovals embedded themselves one after another in the gigantic magnet, from each and every one of the crowd, all but him still sedated and constrained by the armchair cuffs.

“Fraud!” he bellowed, regretting his naiveté. The brave, illustrious Space-Chap? No! Rather, a travelling charlatan with an eye for the pinnacle of Victorian masculinity: pocket watches.

“Why, Space-Chap? Why have you done this to us?”

“My good man,” said the caned shape, smoking his pipe. “They say time is money, and I expect a good return for putting on a show. But if you must truly know, I will tell you!”

And he began:

“It’s simple, gents. There always was an evil, nameless space-god. He feasts not on the souls of the young, the minds of the bright, or the complicated four dimensions of Euclidian geometry. Rather, it feeds on time, quite literally !” Space-Chap chuckled at his own cleverness.

The tiny impish man, who once defiantly demanded to know the space-god’s name, was still unsatisfied with this conclusion.

“That’s absurd!” he croaked with the vocal range of a nail scraping a chalkboard. “If all an elder god would require to thrive is the eating of clocks, why would he employ such an uncivilized ruse?! You are lying to us good sir!”

The fraudulent Space-Chap considered this statement, squinting with growing ire at the man that had seen through his ruse from the start. Silence permeated the room like a thick fog, as the stunned (and restrained) audience awaited a rebuttal from the chap in front. Gripped by the notion that they would finally understand the reason for the insanity of his story, the perplexed and odd behaviour, the utterly gauche notion of feeding clocks to a monster.

And then, Space-Chap uttered the words that explained it all, as his eyes bulged out of his skull, revealing slinky-like springs.

“I totally did it for the lulz!” he laughed maniacally, before exploding into a pile of gears, bolts and steam.

Categories
Arts

Conversations with the Grim Reaper

How should one appropriately mark and deal with the loss that comes with a death? Montrealer, poet and Concordia professor Jason Camlot’s, latest collection, entitled What The World Said dispenses some words of wisdom:

“Only a fool mourns extravagantly at something so inevitable/ you know it has to happen/ so your feelings should be prepared.”

But things are never so easy, and his attempts at acclimatization form the central motif behind the work, letters thematically arranged around the passing of Camlot’s father.

Press photo

Throughout, Camlot calls upon his Jewish heritage. After his father’s death, Camlot observed the year-long grieving process as prescribed by Judaism that included daily forays to synagogue and liberal prayers. The insights and imagery that arise from a not-so-religious man trying to celebrate his father and mourn his passing in religious ways is touching and fascinating.

Intrusive minyans, meditations on Gehenna, and Yiddish (and Hebrew) colloquialism pop up throughout, their combined imagery exploring Jewish notions of loss and acceptance — a heavy subject fitting for a people known for bereaved prophets and wailing congregations.

Drawing upon these roots, Camlot’s questioning is more a resigned petition than an interrogation, and for all his reproach to religion, we get the sense he’s going through the motions with an honest heart but can’t receive full comfort or understanding from conventions done out of propriety. There is always a poignant disconnect in the quest to find meaning or comfort in the ritual.

There are a few rough moments in the sea of letters. The more abstract poems, sometimes abundant in numbers and acronyms, are impenetrable. This is understandable — poetry is first and foremost a triage between the poet’s need to speak, a very varied lexicon and an inner world — but seldom comprehensible.

For this reason, the most interesting and playful parts of the book are the ones where Death is squarely confronted. Here, Camlot’s Grim Reaper is taunted, chastised and implored for answers by a narrator who is innocent and naïve, befuddled at Death’s imposing nature but likewise familiar with him as if he was an acquaintance kept at arm’s length. Death is chastened for not receiving letters and for not returning books. Death is told he can’t have dinner. The narrator is annoyed at Death’s lateness for a game of hockey. Death comes off as that one sympathetic guy, who despite himself (or itself), does as he does.

Finally, the book serves as an exposé of how a wordsmith comes to terms with Death — something of interest to readers who may be searching for a way out of grief and writers wanting to explore the technical aspects of it. Though poetry is more free-form than prose, its clever imagery and arrangement is still an enlightening exercise for conventional writers wishing to explore something different.

Camlot’s What The World Said deftly and expertly employs different angles to get at his sadness, but leaves room for wry humour and a strange lightness and playfulness that will be appreciated even by the heartless.

What The World Said is available for sale at chapters.indigo.ca

 

Categories
News

Liberal candidate for newly-formed Ville-Marie riding shares his views

As a politician trying to reach out and better represent his fellows, Marc Miller is all for devoting great amounts of time to collecting opinions and forging solidarity – except while playing hockey in Sweden.

Photo by Adam Scotti

“I just wanted to play,” said Miller about his time in the rink while living with the Swedes, where Scandinavian consensus-politics dictated everybody’s roles be thoroughly agreed upon and worked out before any ice time. “It drove me nuts.”

Miller, is eager for collaboration everywhere but on the ice, and, if his ambitions as Liberal federal nominee in the newly made riding of Montreal’s Ville-Marie are successful, he may one day represent the interests of students at Concordia.

Miller is typical of the city’s cosmopolitan roots. From a Montreal anglophone mother and Nova Scotian father, he received a solidly francophone education until law school led him to corporate law in Montreal, down south, and across the sea.

His passionate Liberal leanings are firm, but not necessarily dogmatic. He is open to self-criticism and he is cognisant of the fact that there is a long way to go to making the Liberals relevant again.

“The Liberal party has reached the bottom of the barrel,” he said, mentioning the sponsorship scandal and other issues that have deeply scarred the Liberal’s ability to reconnect with Canadians. “You know there’s something wrong when 90% of the job is showing up and listening. Simply going into the riding, talking to people, getting a deep understanding of the issues is the first step — it isn’t the only one, but it is the key formal step to getting involved with people.”

In an effort to shift momentum and do his part in Montreal, Miller has set his sights on the Ville-Marie riding.

“Ville-Marie is the centre of town. It is truly the core of Montreal. If you’re truly interested in making a difference, this is a part of the city where you can. There are no sleeper communities [here]. There are communities in dire need of someone that’s really implicated at the local level. We have some of the richest people in the country; we have some of the poorer people of the country.  There’s a real, real need for local politicians, not just federal, but municipal and provincial, to get involved in [the] challenges of income gaps, education, skilled employment, and concern for new Canadians.”

A business-lawyer-cum-politician may not be to everybody’s liking, doubly so for a party that’s been accused in the past for cozying up to the corporate vote. Miller highlights the advantages of his calling, and how working with large corporations can help the little guy: “Sitting where you are, at first glance, they might seem like they are [incompatible]. Being a corporate lawyer, you work a lot of hours and you talk to a lot of people and you pick up the phone and you negotiate and you make compromises. You work extremely hard. You pay attention to your client, and you hope to make the change that they desire. This translates quite easily, from a purely strategic perspective, to politics.”

Miller has drawn on his professional and personal experiences from living both here and abroad to shape his views. He lived for a few years in New York, a city he described as very competitive and affording him the satisfaction of working with some of the brightest people in the world. Yet the hyperactive New York environment, with its grand emphasis on wealth and deep economic fault lines, wasn’t the ideal place to raise his two children. So instead he went to his wife’s native Sweden, in many ways diametrically opposite to the Big Apple, with its socialism, free health care and education, and its low salary and high taxes. In the end there was no place like Quebec, and no home like Montreal.

Montreal’s cultural strengths and activist streak and strong cultural institutions are all things Miller believes can be harnessed to improve the condition of its citizens.

“I realized [after living abroad] I really, really enjoyed living in Montreal. I really, really love my city and I don’t think I could choose, if I had the choice, to live in any other city than Montreal. I see where it’s going, and I want to make sure it doesn’t go there.”

The plan to raise employment, lower debts, and improve education, he admits, is not something you can change in a just a few years. But there are ways to begin, and one of them is with voters.

Cognisant of the deep cynicism of disaffected youth, often alienated by an impersonal and distant political system, he holds firmly to the belief that students and young adults have the potential for great energy and hope, and doubly so for Quebec’s students, familiar as they are with political activism. He’s actively encouraging young people to take back their political rights of participation.

“My advice will be to find a local representative – municipal, provincial, federal – [and] approach them and ask them how you can help. It’s a real eye-opening experience to get in […] and run and organize a campaign. It gives you a skillset you can’t get here [in universities] nor should it be taught here, but it is a fantastic experience in organizing, meeting people, developing people skills, and developing human skills. I would encourage any student to get out there and get their hands in the soil. There’s a lot of clubs and political philosophy groups and they’re great as well but I think the mistake that’s made amongst the university corps is to stay too close to your comfort zone. And that’s too bad.”

“As Montrealers we have do dare to be able to take the risks whether we fail or not.”

Categories
Student Life

Polyamory: Love multiplied is love shared

Graphic by Jennifer Kwan

Here’s a joke: a polyamorous couple decide to have a date with their special somebody on Valentine’s Day. By the end of the night, it doubles as an excuse for a house party.

If you don’t get the (admittedly lame) joke, it’s probably because you don’t know what the definition of polyamory is. Unlike swingers, who believe in recreational sex with others and with which polyamorists are often mistaken for, polyamorists are defined by a practice of carrying on multiple emotionally intimate relationships simultaneously. Swingers will sleep with you, but may not love you; polyamorists might just end up sleeping with you and build a deep, long-term commitment to boot. Because of its not-as-prominent profile, polyamory arguably remains even less understood and accepted by society than swinging.

So, to clear the air, The Concordian decided to interview Jocelyn Beaudet, a staff member, Concordia student, and polyamorist himself, to find out the dynamics, both positive and negative, of this often misunderstood lifestyle. What follows is an edited and condensed Q&A.

Q. How do you perceive mainstream views of polyamory, its confusion with swinging, and how do you respond to these views?

Polyamory views are in general very misguided. People have this idea that polyamory and open relationships are the same, when in reality they couldn’t be farther apart.

For starters, polyamory is about maintaining relationships between multiple individuals, without restrictions, and implies no central relationship or hierarchy. Swingers, on the other hand, explore outside of their relationship, in favour of the central union between the two involved parties. In the broad sense, swingers value their central relationships over those they establish outside of their significant others. Polyamorous couples are decentralized, and all involved parties are treated as equals.

Q: Because of the perceived link between monogamy and love, or even the view of love as being exclusively directed to one person at a time, polyamory and other similar lifestyles have been traditionally seen as being excuses for hedonism and selfishness. How would you respond?

The inherent misconceptions of polyamory and polygamy comes from people who don’t like the idea of sharing and they tend to imply that people are forced into this situation. Polyamory in general explores people’s freedom to connect with anyone and generally rely on reaching a position of comfort between parties involved. Not all polyamorous relationships function on the same central basis. Polyamory is a very personal mode of engaging in interpersonal relationships.

Q: How does one exactly navigate through a relationship like that – what are the rules and guidelines?

First, it’s important to note that there are no main partners. Every partner is treated with equal amounts of love and respect. A primary partner is not more important in that aspect. In general, these relationships tend to revolve around other poly-centric individuals. The reason for this mainly involves the monogamous idea of belonging to one another, almost like a form of emotional ownership. This translates poorly and creates jealousy when a partner falls in love with someone else.

The notion of having a primary/secondary is used only as common vocabulary among polyamorous individuals. The idea of a primary is purely defined by account of having spent more time in a relationship with that person.

Imagine being in love with your significant other. That doesn’t negate that you may equally desire someone else. Having this emotional bond with more than one person can be demanding in terms of finding the right emotional balance and being attentive to your partners, but it’s also incredibly rewarding.

Q: How did you come across polyamory, and were there any repercussions for yourself?

My first serious relationship was with a polyamorous woman, and while I was willing to set aside differences (or so I thought at the time) to make things work, I was also very young and prone to jealousy. My initial reaction was negative but as I grew older I ran into a problem where I would constantly fall in love with individuals and jump from relationship to relationship out of fear of hurting anyone. The social consensus was that I was just unable to commit to anyone, and that the guilt I felt for leaving a relationship in favour of another was just reinforcement of that fact.

In reality, this serial monogamy was a result of my refusal to accept that a person can love more than one individual at a time. Since then I’ve had the opportunity to explore polyamorous relationships and, while they’ve been challenging, making not only yourself but other people who you deeply care about incredibly happy, and having a fulfilling relationship with them and them with you, is possibly one of the most enriching experiences in my life.

Make no mistake though, polyamory demands you to be attentive to your partners and tend to their emotional needs as much as they tend to yours, and to keep a constant open line of communication.

Q: What resources are available to polyamorous couples in Montreal, or in general?

Honestly, the only place I can recommend is FetLife.com. Most other dating sites are strongly monogamous. I’m not familiar with many poly-centric communities in the city but I’m pretty sure they exist.

Q: How would you recommend for individuals or couples wishing to explore polyamory to try it out?

The first rule of thumb is to set boundaries. There are many different types of arrangements. For example, you can have asexual polyamory, which implies that a person can date around, but sex may be off the table. Like all things, these rules need to be respected by both parties and an open communication between them needs to exist.

The second important notion is to understand that on a personal level, your potential ‘other’ partner is just as important as your current one. If you begin to create a hierarchy within partners, you move away from the concepts of polyamory and into the concept of the open relationship. Ethical, consensual non-monogamy is the motto of polyamory.

That’s all the questions we can think of for now. Any last words?

Much love!

Categories
News

Working towards worldwide youth empowerment

If the World University Service Canada’s (WUSC) proposal makes its way through the Concordia Student Union (CSU), just 50 cents a semester from your pocket is all it will take to bring a new type of student to Concordia.

Press image

What WUSC — an organization dedicated to worldwide youth empowerment — seeks to do is implement its tried-and-true Student Refugee Program and see that one lucky individual between the ages of 17 and 25 and currently residing in a refugee camp, be brought over to Montreal, be given permanent residency, and attend the university on a full one-year scholarship.

The initiative, which surpassed the required 750 student signatures during a campaign run in the fall, will see its proposal voted on by a referendum come March.

“This program really gives an opportunity to an individual to gain citizenship and fulfill their potential through education,” said James Arruda, a long-time helper at the all-volunteer organization.

Arruda originally joined in CEGEP to impress a girl, but ended up “impressing himself.” As he explained, it wasn’t a “long story, but a luck story.”

“It was something I should have started long ago, and I really found myself.”

Arruda adds that the organization gave him an outlet for social activism to help others and to fight against closed or xenophobic mindsets.

“I feel that as a privileged individual in a very privileged society you can give that opportunity to somebody [else].”

A dollar might not seem like a lot, but once Concordia’s 30,000 plus student body is pooled together, it’s enough to provide for a budget which would include accommodation in student housing, tuition coverage, a repayment of their travel expenses, and spending money. In addition the budget would also cover a laptop, which WUSC believes is critical to allowing newcomers to fully integrate in an increasingly wired society and school curriculum.

“This isn’t charity. To me, charity is a very hierarchical system where you give them money. This resettlement program is really for them to regain their legal posture and to fulfill their potential,” said Arruda, adding that the organization doesn’t simply bring people over, but befriends them.

“If we kept it professional, we would regard them as a resource, a project, a management decision. We have to look at them like human beings, [as] friends. You yourself can never explain [what it’s like for them]; you can only listen and gain the most out of the experience.”

Because of the instability of trouble zones and the precarious nature of sponsorship contracts, WUSC mainly operates in more stable areas like the refugee camps of Kenya, Malawi, and Thailand, and it is here that applicants are found.

For an individual to apply, superior academic performance is naturally the first step to being noticed. In addition, fluency in the language of the institution is also required as well as a meeting of all program requirements and standards. Applicants go through interviews, and if chosen, may be asked to volunteer in some capacity at their camp while their paperwork is filled and precautions such as health tests are administered.

Although as permanent residents they cannot vote or leave the country without a visa, individuals sponsored by the program would have access to a social security number (allowing them to work), access to health care, and most importantly, the potential for a citizenship and a better and safer life.

Arruda says there are many obstacles to overcome once they do make it here. The novel and trying climate, new faces, and a different way of doing things can contribute to feelings of isolation, culture shock, and homesickness that makes juggling responsibilities tough. In those cases, WUSC is always ready to help.

“We never recommend a student to find a job their first year. We usually tell them that it’s better if they concentrate on their studies and try to get settled in. A lot of them face post-traumatic stress from being placed on a different continent with different people. Anything can happen.”

WUSC offers resources for newcomers to create ties to the new and get reacquainted with the old. Arruda says in most cases the students quickly settle in with the help of everything from clubs and groups, to religious organizations and the near-certain presence of their expat community in the city.

“We want to bring a stronger presence to Concordia and possibly a campus-changing opportunity,” he said, highlighting the potential of Quebec, which unlike other provinces does not have a quota when it comes to these sorts of things.

Ultimately Arruda hopes the coming of WUSC to campus will inspire students to help make a difference.

“I’ve always done this program so I can provide for somebody else to be here. I never thought [about] how it could help me, because I’m already helped.”

Yet, he quickly adds there is something to be gained from giving your time to create such a meaningful chance in a stranger’s life.

“Just like that you can have a new friend, get a new perspective on life. We’re there to also learn from them. We have to get the word out, the questions answered. We have to make it look like a fun program.”

If WUSC Concordia interests you, visit their Facebook group at www.facebook.com/WUSCConcordia.

Categories
News

Concordia gets its day on the stand in opposition to Bill 60

Concordia defended its stance against Bill 60 on Thursday by once again restating its opposition to the controversial legislation adding that universities have always, and should now continue to, promote inclusion and open mindedness.

MONTREAL; QC; September 14, 2013 — Thousands of people marched through the streets of downtown Montreal to protest the proposed ‘Quebec Values Charter’ on Saturday, September 14, 2013. The protest was organized by Quebec Collective against Islamophobia but was attended by people of many different religions, backgrounds and age groups. Photo by Gabriel Ellison-Scowcroft

Concordia Provost Benoit-Antoine Bacon and Roger Côté, vice-president of services at Concordia, represented the university and gave several reasons as to the reasoning behind Concordia’s decision.

“Respect for one another is important for us,” said Côté, “and one such respect is the respect of identity, the recognizing of difference, and the knowledge that such differences enrich us, not only for the individual who displays these differences, but for the greater majority who learns from them. If that dimension of difference wasn’t there, it would lessen the experience.”

They agreed to the need for secularism and restated Concordia’s commitment to that ideal.

The bill as it currently stands is too expansive and needs to be rethought, they said, adding that the Bill would drive away individuals wishing to live, work, and study in the province and on Concordia’s campuses.

“Universities are a place of ideas, a place of innovation. Students who contribute to this innovation are welcome [to Concordia] whatever their origins may be. We’re in competition for the best brains, the best researchers, the best students. … It’s important for Concordia, for Montreal, for Quebec, to attract [them],” said Benoit, highlighting the economic and social benefits outsiders who feel welcomed by Quebec offer to the province.

Brief statements by faculty and students were read out by Concordia’s representatives, hammering in the point that overt religious symbols have never impeded anybody’s access to education, nor their quality of the experience.

Bacon asked as to what kind of a message would be sent if the university started policing what its employees could or could not wear.

“We’re not comfortable with denying access of education because of the way people dress,” said Bacon.

The two men also pointed out that universities have typically enjoyed a measure of independence in such matters as institutions of higher learning, and that the bill threatened these traditional rights.

He said the bill would drive away recruitment of not only students, but faculty needlessly in a time where the best was needed and competition to woo these groups was at an all-time high.

“We’re in a very competitive market …We have to protect our ability to attract the best.”

The public consultations are expected to continue for several more weeks.

Categories
News

John Molson comes first at the 2014 Jeux du Commerce

Months of training has paid off for Concordia’s John Molson School of Business as it beat all challengers to secure the gold at the 2014 Jeux du Commerce (JDC) games, last week.

Press photo

The event, hosted this year by the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, is the oldest of its kind in Canada and currently entering its 26th year. The event drew in over a dozen universities from across Quebec, in addition to the University of Ottawa and the University of Moncton.

The Jeux du Commerce games, whose slogan this year was “Oser. Entreprendre.” or “Dare. Undertake,” aren’t just a collection of boardroom exercises, but varied events that see teams go head-to-head in competitions. There are many components, such as an academic portion made up of business cases, debates, and stock-simulation; sports events; and the measuring of the overall team spirit of the schools with things like video challenges and sponsor-related events; and, finally, the social category, containing fun alternatives like improv teams and DJing.

“It’s very unique. It gives [many] students an opportunity to participate. Just because you’re not necessarily interested in doing academic cases and academic casework throughout the semester, you can also get involved in sports, for example, or social. It’s a way to get people more involved outside of the classroom,” explained John Molson Competition Committee president, Chris Carpini.

As Carpini makes clear, the prelude to the event was paved with sweat and preparation.

“We form our teams for the academic component over the course of the summer. There’s a really vigorous trial process from May through July. [This year] we had over 500 applications. They all try out [with] mock cases and interviews. From that pool of applicants we’ll make the different teams and choose approximately 80 – this year, 70 – to compete.”

For applicants who’ve made the cut, the fall semester consists of practice designed to increase their team cohesion, skill sets, and presentation abilities, as well as meet the constantly evolving requirements and tasks asked by the competition.

For first-time entrant, Loïc Sanscartier, the event proved to be an unforgettable adventure.

“It was an exhilarating experience, because it’s really as amazing as everybody makes it out to be, being there with all the other schools and teams.”

Despite months of work, when it comes to events like case competitions – where teams have to pitch innovative and effective solutions to a real-life business panel – participants have only a few hours following the discovery of their cases to formulate a response. The debate team, however, has even less time.

“Once we get called up and receive our envelope, we’re put in a separate room … and we have [a half-hour] to prep. That’s where it gets stressful, when you know the teams are starting to go up. Especially our team, who was usually one of the last ones to go up in each round. You’re worried about whether you’ll know a bit about the topic that’ll come up or not.”

To cover as much ground as possible and prepare for whatever eventuality might come up, there exists an extensive support community eager to put forward JMSB’s best face. Coaches, (made up of current professors, alumni, business personalities and corporations), work with the students to hone their competitive acumen. There is also a committee, (which itself won first place in the committee category at this year’s JDC), that works with CASA and various sponsors to handle logistics and funding. Finally, JMSB itself provides integral support, even creating for-credit courses specifically designed to help students engaged in business competitions.

“The size of the program has doubled – in terms of the number of students involved – in the past 2 years. We owe a lot of our success to them because there are a lot of schools out there who do not have that level of support and who don’t have the opportunities to send their students to these competitions,” said Carpini.

The winners aren’t sitting on their laurels, either. There are still dozens of other competitions to perform at, such as JDC Central, involving Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes, and beginning in two weeks, a sister event created to emulate French Canada’s JDC success. It’ll be JMSB’s first time sending an entire delegation to those games. Last year only a half delegation was sent.

“It won half delegation of the year, which is basically the top honour we could win,” said Carpini, who simultaneously pointed out that their JDC win has only whet their appetite for more.

“As a committee we’re more pumped than ever. The stakes are high. The schools in Ontario know we won and we’re ready for round two. We’re motivated more than ever to keep it going.”

The games also have a serious, practical application beyond friendly (if fierce) competition and networking: businesses eager to scoop up talent eagerly note performance, and it is not uncommon for students to find their job opportunities significantly improved, if not outright secured.

“This only enhances the value of the JMSB degree, adds value, and increases JMSB’s rankings nationally and internationally,” said Sanscartier, who, while happy with his performance, is also a bit wistful. As he is graduating soon, he will miss the chance to participate in future JDC events.

“I was actually considering extending my degree so I could participate again next year,” he said, laughing.

Categories
Opinions

YES to a right to die, but NO to having your doctor do it

 The Quebec government is one step closer to amending end-of-life care with the successful second-reading vote on Oct. 29 of Bill 52. The Bill, if ultimately passed, will usher in some big changes for end of life care. It will make Quebec the first and only Canadian province legalising a patient’s right to die.

Assisted suicide by itself is nothing ground-breaking in our part of the world. Four U.S. states, including neighbouring Vermont, have provisions for it, some going back all the way to 1997. Canada, by comparison, lags in that it considers it a criminal offense similar to homicide. What Quebec’s Bill 52 hopes to do is not only make it attainable, but expands the list of those who can administer it.

Flickr photo by Mark Cloggins

In the U.S. states that allow it, a doctor can carry out a patient’s desire for assisted suicide by prescribing a lethal dose of medication, to be taken by the patient at their own volition if the patient suffers from a terminal condition.

Bill 52, on the other hand, suffers from vagueness in the wording of the eligibility criteria. The relevant clauses state only that the patient must “suffer from an incurable serious illness,” while another requires that the patient must also “suffer from constant and unbearable physical or psychological pain which cannot be relieved in a manner the person deems tolerable.”

What exactly is an incurable and serious illness, and how is it different from a terminal condition? Paranoia of slippery slopes aside, who’s to say a debilitating case of arthritis or Alzheimer’s, amongst others, won’t be grounds for assisted suicide? What are the reasonable bounds of tolerability, if any? Terminal is a firm term with strong boundaries. A “serious illness” isn’t.

Additionally, how does one judge unbearable psychological pain? Yes, the bill requires “repeated requests” from individuals, provides psychological testing if needed, and needs the affirmation of a second physician. Yet this isn’t enough. What if a patient is in the throes of the prolonged effects of a depression and related psychological anguish (which often come on the coat-tails of medical prognoses)—is such consent valid?  Depression can come and go. Death, by contrast, is permanent. One may wish to die today, but what of tomorrow?

The right to die is a controversial one, but at the very least one largely confined, for good reason, to a single person: the patient. Death should be a private, personal choice under reasonable circumstances, and while the doctor may disagree or agree, the final decision it is quite literally out of his or her hands. Bill 52’s proposed outline will make it not only possible for doctors to carry out assisted suicide, but make it obligatory. Doctor-assisted will become doctor-administered, keeping it equally out of their hands (in making the choice) but in their hands (to carrying it out). A doctor’s refusal to carry out the patient’s wish to die would be considered a denial of proper medical care. Is this the responsibility we should be pawning off on our physicians?

Thankfully we have an example of a system like Quebec’s in Europe. Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland all allow some form of assisted suicide, and the numbers of procedures are now into the thousands each year. Yet the worrying fact isn’t that the numbers are growing but who is doing it. While the majority are still terminal patients suffering from illnesses such as cancer, a steadily increasing amount are electing to go through with it because of such conditions as blindness, depression, or complications from sex-changes, amongst others.

It is a doctor’s duty to do best by the patient. In cases of terminal, painful conditions, this opens up the possibility of giving in to the patient’s desire to end their life. However, expanding the criteria to allow any condition the patients themselves see as ‘unbearable,’ and instituting it as a professional duty, is going too far and amounts to a lackadaisical effort to keeping individuals alive.

Quebec is doing an admirable thing by giving patients the right to die, but they’re acting hastily in implementing it. Not everybody who wants to die should have the avenue to do so, and the wording of the Bill must make this clear. Before we go too far, we should go slow, and institute policies similar to America’s.

All parties involved must admit a certain ethical line is irrevocably crossed when doctors go from overseers of death to active agents in carrying it out. Canadians (foremost Quebecers) are now asking themselves if they are ready to cross this line, and all the moral weight that comes with it.

Categories
Student Life

Shining a light on electronic cigarettes

Electronic cigarettes are still relatively uncommon, but perhaps you’ve seen one here or there, glowing for a moment like a firefly before fading to black. They may just be the next big thing, if they can surmount the controversy they’ve brought along for the ride.

Photo from Flickr.

First, what they are: gadgets superficially resembling a cigarette, (or, if you’re fancy, a pipe), that are at their most basic, a cartridge, an atomizer and a power source. The cartridge contains a solution of vegetable glycerin –— used in the food industry as an additive, preserver, and sweetener –— and either nicotine or flavours such as chocolate, vanilla and mint, which the atomizer heats to a breathable mist. To simulate that cigarette glow, an LED on the other end lights up in a variety of colours, depending on the flavour or brand. While the battery is rechargeable, the cartridges are not, and each holds the equivalent of around 500 puffs, or around a pack to a pack and a half. When compared to regular cigarettes, in terms of cost, the base products are roughly equivalent.

A relatively new technology, they’ve been billed, up until recently, as less harmful alternatives to regular cigarettes; sellers say the cartridge solution contains only what you want and none of what you don’t, like the harmful chemicals,the smell or second-hand smoke.

Yet this should be taken with a grain of salt. Here in Canada, legislation bars nicotine e-cigarette advertisement to the point of being virtually restricted to word-of-mouth marketing and person-to-person purchasing. The reasoning behind this ban is an insufficient knowledge of the long-term impact of nicotine aerosol on health, as well as the possibility that such an alternative would encourage smoking and nicotine addiction, especially amongst youth. In truth, electronic cigarettes are a new technology where authorities are playing catch-up and scrambling to make sense of the whole thing. This lack of regulation has led to a product without safety standards or stringent rules that have both created a restricted climate for sellers. At the same time, it has given rise to a vacuum of established facts in the public consciousness, thus fashioning a haven for self-serving marketing that’s difficult to correctly assess.

So while it’s undeniable these electronic doppelgangers have a growing support base of dedicated puffers and ex-smokers, with testimonials to their efficacy as quitting aids and as classier alternatives to conventional puffing, there is ample evidence to the contrary.

Studies suggest that the heated vapours are damaging to the throat, and that dangerous chemicals are present in the seemingly benign solution. On top of that, ostensibly nicotine-free electronic cigarettes are sometimes anything but, not helped by the fact that most manufacturing comes by way of shady Chinese suppliers.

What’s not open to debate is that the industry is moving faster than any countering oversight. Already, down south and across the border, an accurate perspective of e-cigarette popularity can be gauged by the fact that it’s a billion-dollar industry. Once represented mostly by small intrepid entrepreneurs (a situation still extant in Montreal) big companies are stepping in as a lucrative market emerges. In this Wild West scenario, the onus is, as always, on the public to arm themselves with their own education.

Categories
Student Life

ConUncovered: from YMCA to university

We aren’t an old university, though our presence in the city now appears ubiquitous. Prior to 1974, Concordia as we know it did not exist. Yet, our origins, obscured by time, run deep, and nowhere is this better shown than when one examines our close historical affinity (indeed, our origins) to the YMCA.

Photo from JasonParis on Flickr.

Now known primarily as a place for physical recreation, the Young Men’s Christian Association originally began, and still is in many parts of the world, as a holistic organization for the installment of wholesome character. But it was also the parent organization from which one-half of our university sprang from.

Sir George Williams, the founder of the YMCA and whose name now graces our downtown campus, was an English draper who experienced a religious epiphany and decided to create a non-secular organization to combat the immoral distractions of a London wracked by rough social changes and rapid urbanization. From prayer meetings and bible study, the YMCA expanded to provide vocational activities and teachings and, by 1851, the very first YMCA in North America was founded in Montreal.

The YMCA, following its mandate to care for the mind as well as the body, was for the longest time the main provider of vocational studies for Montreal’s adult anglophone community who couldn’t attend school during the day because of work. This educational arm, christened Sir Williams College, was centered on the YMCA building still extant on Stanley street. Prior to the Second World War, Sir Williams College acted as the first university to offer undergraduate credit courses to adults in Canada.

After the war, the college became a university and was granted a charter. By the 1960s the YMCA ceased being used for classes and a proper location, the Hall building, was constructed in its place and various other annexes added on to house its expanding enrollment. Not coincidentally, this was around the same time the university had sufficiently developed its own independent character and means of support to cut all ties with its erstwhile parent organization, the YMCA.

So now you know the surprisingly deep roots of our university. It’s still anybody’s guess, though, if you can use this information the next time you’re negotiating for a discount membership at the Y.

Categories
Arts

Transcending to new heights of BEAUTY

The trailer is evocative and languorous with haunting close-ups of everyday objects and a soundtrack, simultaneously atmospheric and energetic, that gives everything a dream-like quality. It operates under the maxim ‘less is more’ and you don’t quite know what’s going on. But it draws you in nonetheless.

BEAUTY press photo.

So what is going on? Concordia alumni and director Colin L. Racicot is giving you a peek into his new science fiction film (or, as he explains it, metaphysical short film) BEAUTY, centered on the transcendental metamorphosis of protagonist Michael after his encounter with an alien presence billed as “the world’s most beautiful thing.”

It’s the germination of a long-dormant idea finally being given form.

“The original concept of the story has been haunting me for years, but it only took shape a few months ago, as I started writing a script,” said Racicot. “Ten billion drafts later I had a script so I sent it to my friend Simon Allard, with whom I studied at Concordia in film production. Days later, he was the producer of the film.”

Evoking influences of science fiction gods like Ridley Scott (Blade Runner), Andrei Tarkovsky (Solaris), and Chris Nolan (Inception and Memento), among others, should give you a fair idea of what this movie will be like.

“I don’t want to stick too much to reality. Reality is there every day in our lives. I want to lift the audience in a world that isn’t ours, but that could be ours, as if it was a nightmare, a lucid dream,” said Racicot. “These filmmakers knew how to portray an idea poetically, while taking advantage of the infinite possibilities of the cinematic medium.”

Racicot further explains saying, “the audience will be lifted into this intense ride, move from an extremely boring representation of reality to a surreal and overdosing crystalline world.” Interested?

Racicot hopes you are, because successfully creating BEAUTY will cost a pretty penny, and it goes without saying that providing for everything – rentals, sets, equipment and supplies, vehicles, distribution and production, etc. – takes money.

To pull off this feat, Racicot has engaged the services of Kickstarter for the crowdsourcing of his film. By soliciting help from anonymous and the not-so-anonymous alike he hopes to raise the $7,500 budget within the next four weeks. As anybody who’s had to pitch knows, selling an idea is hard.

“Perhaps what is most challenging about the kickstarter phase of the project, and what is really the challenge for any crowdsourced project, is convincing regular consumers that your product is worth investing into. You have to sell the dream before the dream exists,” said Racicot.

And he certainly has ambitious dreams.

“BEAUTY could be the beginning of a big adventure. I don’t see this film as a single short; we could easily develop this into a mini-series or even a feature film. I’ve always been kind of reluctant to the TV-series format, but after watching Breaking Bad… what can I say… I feel like the possibilities are endless.”

So, Concordia, check it out and give a former Concordian’s vibrant creativity the support of your eyes. It may be the prettiest thing you’ve seen all day.

If you’d like to view Colin L. Racicot’s BEAUTY, the teaser is now on Kickstarter. Pledgers, depending on the donated amount, will receive exclusive material and other perks in appreciation.

For more info, please visit:

kickstarter.com/projects/cinesthetique/beauty-a-metaphysical-short-film

 

Categories
Opinions

Opinions: Egyptian Military vs. Muslim Brotherhood: two sides of the same coin

The world has its eye on Egypt, and many have been quick to choose a side. However, the complexity amidst the turmoil makes it rather hard to point fingers in just one direction.

Anti-SCAF protests. Photo from Gigi Ibrahim on Flickr.

In one corner is the Egyptian army under the leadership of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF). After a year of chaos under Prime Minister Mohamed Morsi, the SCAF, in the supposed interest of the people, has deposed the Prime Minister. SCAF outlawed his Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group, installed itself as interim protectors of the revolution, and vowed a fresh round of elections.

Prim in their medal-laden and immaculately pressed army uniforms, these chosen few wave a paper. They believe their ‘roadmap’ to peace and stability is the only sure defense for all Egyptians against fanatics, counter-revolutionaries and terrorists.

In reality, the army is a cabal that has run and exploited the Egyptian state for five decades. When the revolution in Tahrir square began and millions of Egyptians across the country took to the streets, united in their opposition to the authoritarian regime of Hosni Mubarak, where was the army? They were the ones wielding police batons as maces and plowing into the very people they now claim to represent. They were the ones that stood by and even aided sectarian violence against the Copts, Egypt’s Christian minority.

To stave off the revolution, they killed innocent protesters; now, to preserve it, they kill hundreds more. This roadmap of theirs will surely be a path doubling back to feed upon itself, producing more of the same. Can one honestly expect anything different from an organization whose command structure remains virtually unchanged throughout all this upheaval? Anybody who truly believes they’ll give over power, or even agree to share it with whoever they allow to win any future elections, is sadly mistaken.

In the other corner is the equally distasteful Muslim Brotherhood. A blatantly Islamist movement with aims at refashioning Egyptian society to be more sharia-compliant, they eked out a victory at the polls in the first democratic elections Egypt has ever had in its 6,000 years of recorded history. They essentially bribed their way past the finish line by providing supplies and services to the marginalized and poor.

Rather than pragmatically compromising, they proceeded to assume they had a mandate to rule alone. They ignored the constitution, handed Morsi powers above and beyond judiciary oversight, and alienated wide segments of the population to the point where their opponents had nowhere to turn to but the military.

They played and lost the guessing game of how many constitutional abuses it takes to bring down a democratically appointed government. By their numerous steps back, they’ve erased the one forceful stride forward the Egyptian people managed to take for themselves.

This is why it is difficult to pick a side. If this was Frost’s proverbial fork in the road, neither road would make all the difference. Egypt’s people continue to suffer and die. Their hopes of implementing a government that is answerable to its constituents is quite dead.

It might as well be decided by flipping a quarter. No matter the result – heads or tails, Muslim Brotherhood or army – we are dealing with two sides of the same coin.

People have long memories, even if they have short attention spans. This brief taste of empowerment may still give Egypt’s people victory – one day.

Exit mobile version