What was I thinking? 2006-2007 edition

With the NHL season coming to a close and many positions for the playoffs already locked down, it looks like a perfect opportunity to look at my selections from last year. The Eastern conference looks pretty awful at the top with my selections of Ottawa, the Rangers and Carolina to win their divisions.

With the NHL season coming to a close and many positions for the playoffs already locked down, it looks like a perfect opportunity to look at my selections from last year.

The Eastern conference looks pretty awful at the top with my selections of Ottawa, the Rangers and Carolina to win their divisions. Two of those teams are in danger of missing the playoffs.

Buffalo, New Jersey and Atlanta at 4-5-6 are close to being right. if I had them at 1-2-3. Philadelphia at 8 was because I couldn’t imagine them missing the playoffs.

Pittsburgh at 14 was because I had them at 4 last year and overrated them. This year it seems I underrated them. By a lot. Oops.

In the West, Anaheim and Nashville at the top look pretty good. San Jose, Dallas and Detroit at 4-5-6 are also pretty decent. Edmonton and Columbus were my attempts at being bold. Turns out I was just being wrong.

Here are the standings as of April 2, with my prediction in brackets.


EASTERN CONFERENCE

1. Buffalo (4)
2. New Jersey (5)
3. Atlanta (6)
4. Ottawa (1)
5. Pittsburgh (14)
6. Rangers (2)
7. Tampa Bay (9)
8. Montreal (7)
9. Toronto (11)
10. Carolina (3)
11. Islanders (15)
12. Florida (12)
13. Boston (10)
14. Washington (13)
15. Philadelphia (8)

WESTERN CONFERENCE

1. Detroit (6)
2. Anaheim (1)
3. Vancouver (11)
4. Nashville (2)
5. San Jose (4)
6. Dallas (5)
7. Minnesota (9)
8. Calgary (3)
9. Colorado (13)
10. St. Louis (15)
11. Columbus (8)
12. Edmonton (7)
13. Chicago (14)
14. Los Angeles (12)
15. Phoenix (10)


The results

Within three spots: 17/30 (56.67 per cent)

Playoff teams: 12/16 (80 per cent)

All in all, not too shabby. Better than last year, anyway.

The playoff teams are something I’m pretty proud of, but it’s increasingly hard to pick the right order of things.

Although, let’s have a look at Sports Illustrated’s predictions and compare their results to mine. (Note: SI did not put teams 1-2-3 based on division championships. I will be adjusting their selections to meet that standard. Teams affected are: Carolina (4 to 3), Ottawa (3 to 4), Calgary (3 to 2), Nashville (4 to 3) and San Jose (2 to 4).

Within three spots: 13/30 (43.33 per cent)

Playoff teams: 12/16 (80 per cent)

(notable: 7/8 teams in Western conference)

Now this isn’t a knock on Sports Illustrated, as I’m a very happy subscriber, I just want to point out that this predicting stuff is harder than it looks!

Both of us had Pittsburgh and Vancouver missing the playoffs (SI had the Penguins 9th, and the Canucks 11th). Both of us had the Rangers winning the Atlantic division, while they currently sit in third and we both had Calgary winning the Pacific as they fight for their playoff lives with the Colorado Avalanche.

The new NHL leads to a lot of surprises, which is great for entertainment. I just hope that one day my picks can improve just a little bit.

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

RINGSIDE

Next Article

Literary Blue: Metropolis book fest is back

Related Posts

Concordia continues to struggle

Stingers head coach Kevin Figsby was hoping to come off the first four games of the season with a 2-2 record. After four games, the team's record is 0-2-1-1. With a tie in Trois-Rivieres, and a disappointing loss in Ottawa, the Stingers came into last Wednesday night's home opener against rival McGill with high hopes.

Men’s hockey team gearing up for 2007-08

It's the time of year when Canadians across the world rejoice. Skates are being laced, sticks are being taped, and the sound of fresh ice being laid is resonating throughout the empty arena. The Stingers 2007 men's hockey team have opened their camp and undergone fitness testing for the past few weeks in preparation for the new season that starts at home on Oct.